2021
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2020.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wound Irrigation in Orthopedic Open Fractures: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Se considera que el desbridamiento acompañado con irrigación de solución salina a baja presión reduce la carga bacteriana y elimina los contaminantes sin alterar significativamente los procesos normales de curación (8).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Se considera que el desbridamiento acompañado con irrigación de solución salina a baja presión reduce la carga bacteriana y elimina los contaminantes sin alterar significativamente los procesos normales de curación (8).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…5 Chlorhexidine exerts a bactericidal effect on gram positive organisms at low concentrations, whereas higher concentrations are necessary for effectiveness against gram negative and fungal organisms. 30,32 Its largest benefits are persistence, having been shown to be effective for up to 6 hours on the skin, and being not significantly affected by blood or organic material. 31 At higher concentrations, however, chlorhexidine has been shown to cause host cell toxicity and, therefore, is not recommended in the setting of open wounds.…”
Section: Surgical Preparation and Sterile Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the CDC recommends utilizing an alcohol-based preparation unless contraindicated 5. Chlorhexidine exerts a bactericidal effect on gram positive organisms at low concentrations, whereas higher concentrations are necessary for effectiveness against gram negative and fungal organisms 30,32. Its largest benefits are persistence, having been shown to be effective for up to 6 hours on the skin, and being not significantly affected by blood or organic material 31.…”
Section: Infection Risk Factors and Preventative Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 This practice has been extensively questioned by emerging evidence on the type, volume and flow of irrigation. 48,82 Several studies have demonstrated that high-pressure pulsatile lavage is superior at removing bacteria and debris compared to low-pressure. 48 On the contrary, numerous animal and experimental studies have suggested that high-pressure pulsatile lavage can have deleterious effects by causing tissue damage in the wound.…”
Section: Irrigationmentioning
confidence: 99%