The highly publicised case of the first ever partial facial transplant in 2005
sparked fierce ethical debates, moral arguments and strong opinions, both within
the medical community as well as the general public and mass media. As more
patients have undergone facial transplantation over the last decade, some of
this initial scepticism has given way to a wider acceptance of this significant
reconstructive development. However, despite an improved understanding of the
perioperative technicalities and postoperative perils, the risks remain
significant and the long-term outcomes are still largely unknown. This article
examines the major ethical challenges that have accompanied facial
allo-transplantation since its inception. We discuss these ethical dilemmas in
the context of the patients, donor families, healthcare professionals and
society as a whole, while evaluating some of the emerging evidence and outcomes
associated with the physical and psycho-emotional risks linked to this
procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.