2016
DOI: 10.1163/15700585-12341405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing Change: Diglossia and Popular Writing Practices in Egypt

Abstract: Arabic is considered a paradigmatic case of diglossia, where written language is regarded as largely the domain of fuṣḥā. Presenting the results of a large-scale survey of language attitudes and practices in Cairo, we argue that this view should be reconsidered. A representative majority of Cairo’s literate population in fact report writing predominantly in the vernacular (ʿāmmiyya), and also regard it as a legitimate written variety, contradicting common assumptions about popular language attitudes. At the sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey covered a host of questions on language use and attitudes. The full list of results is published in Kebede et al (2013) for Cairo, and Kindt et al (2016) for Rabat. For a deeper analysis into and explanation of the Egypt survey specifically, see Kindt et al (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The survey covered a host of questions on language use and attitudes. The full list of results is published in Kebede et al (2013) for Cairo, and Kindt et al (2016) for Rabat. For a deeper analysis into and explanation of the Egypt survey specifically, see Kindt et al (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Language Change in the Arab World (lcaw) project evolved from the collective sense of the researchers involved that there appears to be a significant shift underway in writing practices and attitudes toward writing in the Arab world. This paper proposes a framework for the study of attitudes toward writing in non-standard Arabic, and applies this framework to data from a Twitter hashtag about writing in Arabic, and to the results of the 2013 and 2015 fafo surveys of language attitudes and society in Cairo and Rabat Kindt 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second principle of the integrated approach, that only SA is written and that exposure to written VA should therefore be avoided, reflects Ferguson's original conception of diglossia, but fits poorly with current linguistic practices. VA is today the dominant variety in many forms of informal written communication, including in social media, text messaging, and, depending on the level of formality, in e-mails (Kindt, Høigilt and Kebede 2016;Alkhamees, Elabdali and Walters 2019). For many Arabic speakers, these forms of communication make up a large part of the writing they encounter and produce in their daily lives.…”
Section: Principles Of the Integrated Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the transcripts provide a familiarity with written VA, which has become the default form in informal electronic written communication (Kindt, Høigilt and Kebede 2016;Alkhamees, Elabdali and Walters 2019). Familiarity with this form of writing is crucial for well-rounded communicative competence in contemporary Arab societies.…”
Section: Advantages Of a Text-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard Arabic is acquired later through formal education as a second language, although children are exposed to it from a young age through audiovisual media (Saiegh-Haddad, 2003). The spoken varieties are also commonly used in informal written communication in text messaging and on social media (Abu Elhija, 2014;Kindt, Høigilt, & Kebede, 2016). The vast majority of writing is nevertheless in Standard Arabic, and readers have an advantage in visual word recognition in written Standard Arabic over written forms of their spoken variety (Nevat, Khateb, & Prior, 2014).…”
Section: Case In Arabicmentioning
confidence: 99%