2017
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1340931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Written feedback provided by first-year engineering students, undergraduate teaching assistants, and educators on design project work

Abstract: Feedback is an important part of design education. To better understand how feedback is provided to students on their engineering design work, we characterised and compared first-year engineering students', undergraduate teaching assistants', and educators' written feedback on sample student design work. We created a coding scheme including two domains: Substance and Focus of feedback. Educators made more and longer comments than undergraduate teaching assistants, and undergraduate teaching assistants made mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on tutors' type of feedback or strategies during studio critiques is rich (Adams et al 2016;Cardoso et al 2016;Cennamo & Brandt 2012;Dannels & Martin 2008;Goldschmidt et la. 2010;Heylighen et al 1999;Marbouti et al 2017;Schön 1985;Uluoglu 2000;Yilmaz & Daly 2016). Based on our literature review, we propose a classification of tutors' feedback types into four main categories : scaffolding implies reasoning, questioning and reflecting on a design issue, explaining / instructing illustrates a descriptive and explicit approach of discussing a design issue, demonstrating / proposing involves the formulation of new ideas, changes in the design and suggesting / exploring calls for experimentations and opening the design process (Table 1).…”
Section: Pedagogic Strategies and Feedbacks During Design Critiquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on tutors' type of feedback or strategies during studio critiques is rich (Adams et al 2016;Cardoso et al 2016;Cennamo & Brandt 2012;Dannels & Martin 2008;Goldschmidt et la. 2010;Heylighen et al 1999;Marbouti et al 2017;Schön 1985;Uluoglu 2000;Yilmaz & Daly 2016). Based on our literature review, we propose a classification of tutors' feedback types into four main categories : scaffolding implies reasoning, questioning and reflecting on a design issue, explaining / instructing illustrates a descriptive and explicit approach of discussing a design issue, demonstrating / proposing involves the formulation of new ideas, changes in the design and suggesting / exploring calls for experimentations and opening the design process (Table 1).…”
Section: Pedagogic Strategies and Feedbacks During Design Critiquesmentioning
confidence: 99%