Wybrane problemy metodologii pomiaru nowego paradygmatu rozwoju – polskie doświadczenia

Abstract

StreszczenieW artykule dokonano próby podsumowania dotychczasowych polskich doświadczeń w tworzeniu podstaw metodologii pomiaru nowego paradygmatu rozwoju, nazywanego w artykule rozwojem zintegrowanym. Przyjęto założenie, że konkretyzacja i pomiar rozwoju to pojęcia ściśle ze sobą powiązane. Podstawą metodologiczną tworzenia zestawów wskaźników dla nowego paradygmatu rozwoju jest właśnie różnego typu operacjonalizacja. Służy ona monitorowaniu realizacji wielu dokumentów planistycznych, opracowywanych na różnych poziomach zarządzania rozwojem (lokalnym, regionalnym, krajowym itd.) przez określenie dla każdego poziomu uzgodnionego i dobrze określonego zestawu mierników. W artykule tym sformułowano odpowiedzi na następujące, ważne pytania. Jaka jest mapa drogowa polskich doświadczeń w pomiarze nowego paradygmatu rozwoju? Jakie jest odniesienie tej polskiej mapy do doświadczeń międzynarodowych i umownie wydzielonych etapów ewolucji podejścia do nowego paradygmatu? Jaki jest stan i główne problemy metodologiczne związane z pomiarem nowego paradygmatu? Co obecnie można uznać w tej metodologii za względ-nie ustabilizowane i jakie problemy można przyjąć za nadal otwarte?Słowa kluczowe: metodologia, paradygmat, pomiar, rozwój zintegrowany SELECTED PROBLEMS OF MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY OF NEW DEVELOPMENT PARADIGM: POLISH EXPERIENCES SummaryThe paper attempts to summarize the existing Polish experiences in creating the foundations of a methodology for measuring the new development paradigm, here referred to as integrated development. It was assumed that both the embodiment and measurement of development represent closely related terms. A methodological basis for the sets of measures for the new development paradigm is provided by various types of operationalization. They are used to monitor the implementation of numerous planning documents, prepared at different levels (local, regional, national etc.), by means of identifying sets of measures, agreed upon and well defined for each level. The paper offers answers to the following important questions: What is the road map of Polish experiences in measuring the new development paradigm? How does this Polish map relate to international experiences and conventionally distinguished stages of evolution in the approach to this paradigm? What is the status and major methodological problems related with the measurement of the new paradigm? What elements of the methodology can currently be considered relatively stable and which problems must be regarded as unresolved?

European Union and Sustainable Development Indicators

“…To measure the progress in this area, which is an integral part of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy, is based on a set of sustainable development indicators developed by the European Commission in cooperation with Member States, EFTA (European Free Trade Association) and EU candidate countries. Monitoring the EU Sustainable Development Strategy is carried out on the principles and development objectives for each dimension (Borys, 2014). Considering the category of "dimension" indicators of sustainable development relate to (European Union, 2009): social dimension -indicators of improving life quality of society, economic dimensionindicators related to an effective socio-economic 22 development, environmental dimension -indicators taking into account protection and rational shaping of the natural environment, global and institutional dimension -indicators covering the challenges of global partnership and good governance.…”

Economic Development of the European Union in the Relation of Sustainable Development—Taxonomic Analysis

“…Therefore, the assessment of the progress of EU countries in implementing the economic governance in the context of sustainable development requires the selection of an appropriate set of indicators. For a long time, there has been a discussion in the literature on the measurement of sustainable development and the choice of commonly accepted indicators [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] by identifying a number of prerequisites in relation to the adopted variables. These should be relevant for the purpose of the study and consistent with the adopted definition of sustainability, measurable, define all areas of sustainability, independent of each other, and non-duplicating in terms of the conveyed information, as well as being reliable and easily accessible, up to date, and regularly updated [48].…”

Multidimensional Assessment of the Social Development of EU Countries in the Context of Implementing the Concept of Sustainable Development

“…Measuring and monitoring the implementation of the concept of sustainable development is an important aspect of the assessment of the functioning of EU countries [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. One of the pivots of sustainable development is social order, but literature analysis indicates that such empirical research pursued in a multidimensional approach is scarce.…”