No abstract

StreszczenieW artykule dokonano próby podsumowania dotychczasowych polskich doświadczeń w tworzeniu podstaw metodologii pomiaru nowego paradygmatu rozwoju, nazywanego w artykule rozwojem zintegrowanym. Przyjęto założenie, że konkretyzacja i pomiar rozwoju to pojęcia ściśle ze sobą powiązane. Podstawą metodologiczną tworzenia zestawów wskaźników dla nowego paradygmatu rozwoju jest właśnie różnego typu operacjonalizacja. Służy ona monitorowaniu realizacji wielu dokumentów planistycznych, opracowywanych na różnych poziomach zarządzania rozwojem (lokalnym, regionalnym, krajowym itd.) przez określenie dla każdego poziomu uzgodnionego i dobrze określonego zestawu mierników. W artykule tym sformułowano odpowiedzi na następujące, ważne pytania. Jaka jest mapa drogowa polskich doświadczeń w pomiarze nowego paradygmatu rozwoju? Jakie jest odniesienie tej polskiej mapy do doświadczeń międzynarodowych i umownie wydzielonych etapów ewolucji podejścia do nowego paradygmatu? Jaki jest stan i główne problemy metodologiczne związane z pomiarem nowego paradygmatu? Co obecnie można uznać w tej metodologii za względ-nie ustabilizowane i jakie problemy można przyjąć za nadal otwarte?Słowa kluczowe: metodologia, paradygmat, pomiar, rozwój zintegrowany SELECTED PROBLEMS OF MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY OF NEW DEVELOPMENT PARADIGM: POLISH EXPERIENCES SummaryThe paper attempts to summarize the existing Polish experiences in creating the foundations of a methodology for measuring the new development paradigm, here referred to as integrated development. It was assumed that both the embodiment and measurement of development represent closely related terms. A methodological basis for the sets of measures for the new development paradigm is provided by various types of operationalization. They are used to monitor the implementation of numerous planning documents, prepared at different levels (local, regional, national etc.), by means of identifying sets of measures, agreed upon and well defined for each level. The paper offers answers to the following important questions: What is the road map of Polish experiences in measuring the new development paradigm? How does this Polish map relate to international experiences and conventionally distinguished stages of evolution in the approach to this paradigm? What is the status and major methodological problems related with the measurement of the new paradigm? What elements of the methodology can currently be considered relatively stable and which problems must be regarded as unresolved?

The objective of the paper is to identify and classify the conditions for unethical environmental behaviour. It has been shown that the primary condition for unethical environmental behaviour is the level of environmental ethics dominant in a community and the observed inconsistency between the declared level of this ethics and the practice of business, institutional (including legal), social, market, etc. behaviour towards the environment. The observed axiological inconsistency generates numerous external and internal phenomena (factors, conditions) that create fertile ground for unethical activities leading to environmental degradation. The external conditions comprise, among others, complicated tax systems, subsidy and subvention systems and prices of emission allowances. The short term perspective of enterprises, the decreasing average working time of managers, a crisis of ethical leadership and a low level of responsibility for the environment have been identified as the most important internal conditions. Unethical environmental behaviour is further intensified in the absence of control and external reaction to its occurrence.

The article presents the importance of research on quality of life, the general concept of this category and criteria for the classification of generating important typologies quality of life, the description of which is the core content of the article. The article is development of the ideas and proposals put forward in earlier publications of the author. The added value of this work lies primarily in identifying two tendencies in discussions on the terminology of life quality and derived concepts. An attempt was made to determine the general concept of life quality, taking into account the proposed definition of axiological ground. Also typology classification criteria of quality were grouped for those that are disclosed axiology and those with hidden axiology. The study also presents some problems with measuring the quality of life within particular its classifications.

No abstract