SummaryPacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is developing the concept of an automated UF 6 cylinder verification station that would be located at key measurement points to positively identify each cylinder, measure its mass and enrichment, store the collected data in a secure database, and maintain continuity of knowledge on measured cylinders until the arrival of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors. At the center of this unattended system is a hybrid enrichment assay technique that combines the traditional enrichment-meter method (based on the 186-keV peak from 235 U) with nontraditional neutron-induced high-energy gamma-ray signatures (spawned primarily by 234 U alpha emissions and 19 F(α,n) reactions). Previous work by PNNL provided proof-of-principle for the nontraditional signatures to support accurate, full-volume interrogation of the cylinder enrichment, thereby reducing the systematic uncertainties in enrichment assay due to UF 6 heterogeneity and providing greater sensitivity to material substitution scenarios [Smith 2009;Smith In press].The work described here builds on that preliminary evaluation of the non-traditional signatures, but focuses on a prototype field system utilizing NaI(Tl) and LaBr 3 (Ce) spectrometers, and enrichment analysis algorithms that integrate the traditional and non-traditional signatures. Results for the assay of Type-30B cylinders ranging from 0.2 to 4.95 wt% 235 U, at an AREVA fuel fabrication plant in Richland, WA, are described for the following enrichment analysis methods: 1) traditional enrichment meter signature (186-keV peak) as calculated using a square-wave convolute (SWC) algorithm; 2) nontraditional high-energy gamma-ray signature that provides neutron detection without neutron detectors and 3) hybrid algorithm that merges the traditional and non-traditional signatures. Uncertainties for each method, relative to the declared enrichment for each cylinder, are calculated and compared to the uncertainties from an attended HPGe verification station at AREVA, and the IAEA's uncertainty target values for feed, tail and product cylinders. Table 1 provides a summary of those results below. Traditional NaI (SWC method) 3.5 7.9 13Non-Traditional NaI 3.7 4.9 32Hybrid NaI (simple average) 2.5 4.6 9.71 The target uncertainties are estimated from the combination of systematic and random errors given in Kuhn and should be used only to set the scale of the target uncertainties.iv A summary of the major findings from the field measurements and subsequent analysis follows:• Traditional enrichment-meter assay using specially collimated NaI spectrometers and a SquareWave-Convolute algorithm can achieve uncertainties comparable to HPGe and LaBr for product, natural and depleted cylinders.• Non-traditional signatures measured using NaI spectrometers enable interrogation of the entire cylinder volume and accurate measurement of absolute 235 U mass in product, natural and depleted cylinders.• A hybrid enrichment assay method can achieve lower uncertainties than e...