2001
DOI: 10.1086/321511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X‐Ray and Ultraviolet Orbital Phase Dependence in LMC X‐3

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The orbital X-ray flux changes are smaller (Boyd, Smale, & Dolan 2001). Thus, the indicated large flux range reported here in the far-FUV has not been seen at other wavelengths.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The orbital X-ray flux changes are smaller (Boyd, Smale, & Dolan 2001). Thus, the indicated large flux range reported here in the far-FUV has not been seen at other wavelengths.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Patterson et al (2005, and references therein) reports that cataclysmic binaries exhibit superhumps with periodicity a few percent higher than the orbital period provided the mass ratio q = M 2 /M 1 < 0.3 (where, M 2 and M 1 are the companion mass and the compact mass respectively). Boyd, Smale and Dolan (2001) find X-ray modulation in LMC X-3 at the known orbital period of 1.7 days. Brocksopp et al (1999a) find a similar modulation in Cyg X-1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…If the observed variability of Source 2 really reflects an orbital effect, the phase-dependent spectral changes may be caused, e.g., by an orbital modulation in the mass accreting rate, or eclipses of the inner disk. Actually, based on a 6.4-day observation with RXTE, Boyd et al (2001) report on a clear high-energy X-ray modulation in LMC X-3 synchronized with its 1.7-day orbital period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%