2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08754.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray bright optically inactive galaxies inXMM-Newton/Sloan Digital Sky Survey fields: more diluted than absorbed?

Abstract: We explore the properties of X-ray bright optically inactive galaxies (XBONGs) detected in the 0.5-8 keV spectral band in 20 public XMM-Newton fields overlapping with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We constrain our sample to optically extended systems with log f X / f opt > −2 that have spectroscopic identifications available from the SDSS (r < 19.2 mag). The resulting sample contains 12 objects with L X (0.5-8 keV) = 5 × 10 41 -2 × 10 44 erg s −1 in the redshift range 0.06 < z < 0.45. The X-ray emission… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their nature has often been attributed to excess extinction (e.g., Comastri et al 2002;Civano et al 2007) possibly related to their host galaxies being viewed edgeon (Rigby et al 2006). Additional explanations include dilution by the host galaxy (e.g., Moran et al 2002;Georgantopoulos & Georgakakis 2005), unusually weak ionizing continua possibly related to a radiatively inefficient accretion flow (Yuan & Narayan 2004), or beamed emission in the form of a relativistic jet (Caccianiga & Maccacaro 1997;Worrall et al 1999). These AGNs are typically X-ray faint, thus the Chandra Deep Fields are providing significant samples for detailed studies.…”
Section: Agns In Unremarkablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their nature has often been attributed to excess extinction (e.g., Comastri et al 2002;Civano et al 2007) possibly related to their host galaxies being viewed edgeon (Rigby et al 2006). Additional explanations include dilution by the host galaxy (e.g., Moran et al 2002;Georgantopoulos & Georgakakis 2005), unusually weak ionizing continua possibly related to a radiatively inefficient accretion flow (Yuan & Narayan 2004), or beamed emission in the form of a relativistic jet (Caccianiga & Maccacaro 1997;Worrall et al 1999). These AGNs are typically X-ray faint, thus the Chandra Deep Fields are providing significant samples for detailed studies.…”
Section: Agns In Unremarkablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it should be noted that diffuse emission from a galaxy group, whose X-ray extended emission may have escaped detection in low signal-to-noise X-ray observations, is also possible and indeed observed in a few cases (Georgantopoulos et al 2005). While a unique solution may not necessarily hold for all the XBONGs observed in different surveys, they represent a useful benchmark for a better understanding of the AGN activity and, as such, deserve further studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their X-ray luminosities (≈10 42 −10 43 erg s −1 ), X-ray spectral shape and X-ray-to-optical flux ratio (X/O 1 ∼ −1) suggest an AGN activity of moderate strength. Originally discovered in early Einstein observations (Elvis et al 1981) and named optically dull galaxies, interest in the nature of these sources gained a renewed attention after the discovery of several examples in XMM-Newton and Chandra surveys (Fiore et al 2000;Comastri et al 2002a,b;Georgantopoulos et al 2005;Kim et al 2006). Several possibilities were proposed in the literature in order to explain why a relatively luminous, hard X-ray source does not leave any significant signature of its presence in the form of emission lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical normalcy of elusive AGNs and XBONGs may be caused by dilution from host-galaxy starlight (e.g., Moran et al 2002;Georgantopoulos & Georgakakis 2005;Caccianiga et al 2007;Civano et al 2007), attenuation by dust (e.g., Comastri et al 2002;Rigby et al 2006;Smith et al 2014), or perhaps radiatively inefficient accretion flows (Yuan & Narayan 2004), or more speculatively, the "switching-on" of the AGN, where the narrow-line region has yet to be photoionized .…”
Section: Optical Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%