“…Representative crystallographic studies have confirmed that the atoms of C, N, and S in the 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole core are essentially coplanar and that intramolecular bonding is well represented by quinoidal structure 1 . ,,− This preference is consistent with dipole moments measured for the increasingly polarized series of analogues naphthalene, quinoxaline ( 2 ), 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole ( 1 ), and 1,2-benzoquinone ( 3 ), which are 0, 0.51, , 1.8, and 4.2 D, − respectively. Previously published structural studies show that 2,1,3-benzothiadiazoles can engage in various intermolecular interactions, including π-stacking, dipole–dipole interactions, C–H···π interactions, C–H···N interactions, and S···N interactions. ,,− S···N interactions involving benzothiadiazoles can be considered to arise from various effects, including the electrostatic attraction of opposing partial charges and the interaction of S–N σ* orbitals with nonbonding orbitals centered on N. − The strength of S···N interactions appears to be similar to that of typical hydrogen bonds and has been calculated by dispersion-corrected DFT methods to be approximately 4 kcal/mol . However, the relative importance of various interactions characteristic of 2,1,3-benzothiadiazoles remains unclear, and there are no reports of extensive efforts to use these interactions to direct the crystallization of complex 2,1,3-benzothiadiazoles in predetermined ways.…”