2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray diffraction study of GaSb grown by molecular beam epitaxy on silicon substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rocking curve of the sample was also measured, which allowed us to estimate the GaSb FWHM at 295 arcsec, close to the values mentioned in the literature review. The measured value is very similar to the best ones reported in [21] and around 100-200 arcsec higher than the ones reported for Ge-on-Si [22] and GaAs-on-Si [23]. Finally, the morphology of the sample was assessed with AFM ( Fig.…”
Section: Gasb-on-gasb Control Solar Cellsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A rocking curve of the sample was also measured, which allowed us to estimate the GaSb FWHM at 295 arcsec, close to the values mentioned in the literature review. The measured value is very similar to the best ones reported in [21] and around 100-200 arcsec higher than the ones reported for Ge-on-Si [22] and GaAs-on-Si [23]. Finally, the morphology of the sample was assessed with AFM ( Fig.…”
Section: Gasb-on-gasb Control Solar Cellsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…4.(b)). The RMS roughness was evaluated at 2 nm (size of the scan: 10 µm x 10 µm), again close to the values mentioned in the literature (in the lower range of [21], still above the <1 nm of [22]). As a baseline for comparison, according to our own measurements on such samples, the typical value of RMS roughness for a homoepitaxial GaSb-on-GaSb structure is in the 0.1 nm (sub-monolayer) range.…”
Section: Gasb-on-gasb Control Solar Cellsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The low growth temperatures used for the growth can explain the poor organization of the two misfit dislocations networks. direction (the growth direction) and the y axis in the [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] direction. The thin foil is prepared in the [1-10] zone axis.…”
Section: Microstructure Of the Gasb On Gaas-on-si Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to grow GaSb directly on (001) Si have proved to be challenging due to the even larger lattice mismatch of 12.2% and the polar-on-nonpolar interface. The prevailing molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) approach is to deposit an ultra-thin AlSb nucleation layer on Si [7][8][9][10] such that a periodic array of Lomer misfit dislocations, akin to those in the IMF growth of GaSb on GaAs, can be created. However, growing AlSb and related alloys using metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) remains one of the most challenging tasks in all III-V epitaxial material technologies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%