2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray emission from charge exchange in the Cygnus Loop SNR

Abstract: The Cygnus Loop has been the focus of substantial debate concerning the contribution of charge exchange (CX) to supernova remnant (SNR) X-ray emission. We take advantage of a distinct feature of CX, enhanced Kα forbidden line emission, and employ the energy centroid of the OVII Kα triplet as a diagnostic. Based on X-ray spectra extracted from an extensive set of Suzaku observations, we measure the energy centroid shifts of the triplet on and off the shock rim of the remnant. We find that enhanced forbidden to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we assume our result can be applied to other nearby SNRs, it is possible to identify regions where CX is dominantly occurring. As pointed out in several studies (Katsuda et al 2012;Roberts & Wang 2015;Uchida et al 2019), the Cygnus Loop is one of the plausible candidates for detecting CX. Given that the Cygnus Loop has a spherical shell with an apparent diameter of 3°, we expect that a pure CX emission can be detected in a thickness of ∼15″ from the shock front.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If we assume our result can be applied to other nearby SNRs, it is possible to identify regions where CX is dominantly occurring. As pointed out in several studies (Katsuda et al 2012;Roberts & Wang 2015;Uchida et al 2019), the Cygnus Loop is one of the plausible candidates for detecting CX. Given that the Cygnus Loop has a spherical shell with an apparent diameter of 3°, we expect that a pure CX emission can be detected in a thickness of ∼15″ from the shock front.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If we assume our result can be applied to other nearby SNRs, it is possible to identify regions where CX is dominantly occurring. As pointed out in several studies (Katsuda et al 2012;Roberts & Wang 2015;Uchida et al 2019), the Cygnus Loop is one of the plausible candidates for detecting CX. Given that the Cygnus Loop has a spherical shell with an apparent diameter of 3 • , we expect that a pure CX emission can be detected in a thickness of ∼ 15 from the shock front.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Heliospheric CX, varying on the timescale of days to weeks, is particularly difficult to identify and subtract in observations. Astrophysically, there are hints of CX in objects such as clusters of galaxies (Aharonian et al ; Walker et al ), starbust galaxies (Tsuru et al ), and supernova remnants (Roberts & Wang ). CX is thus relevant to our current observations from, e.g., XMM‐Newton and Chandra , as well as from future missions such as XRISM and Athena .…”
Section: Charge Exchange Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%