2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2016.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy and Monte Carlo characterization of a unique nuragic artifact (Sardinia, Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained from the XRF analyses are affected by the silver‐rich surface layer. This problem could be solved by the Monte Carlo simulation methods that have been used generally for XRF spectroscopy since the 1970s (Hawthorne and Gardner ) and more recently, with high efficiency, for layered systems on coins (Brunetti et al ). Although this is a state‐of‐the art method, its use was not among the purposes of the research presented here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained from the XRF analyses are affected by the silver‐rich surface layer. This problem could be solved by the Monte Carlo simulation methods that have been used generally for XRF spectroscopy since the 1970s (Hawthorne and Gardner ) and more recently, with high efficiency, for layered systems on coins (Brunetti et al ). Although this is a state‐of‐the art method, its use was not among the purposes of the research presented here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A threshold was set at the third order, as errors in the atomic parameters accumulate with a growing interaction order and may result in a loss of significance. This methodology has already been extensively used with archaeological manufacts [7,[18][19][20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using pXRF for the accurate determination of metal alloy artworks composition in situ at the museum is a real challenge. There are some difficulties, such as problems with measurement geometry (measurement distance, sample positioning, irradiation spot, X-ray penetration depth), artwork surface (non flat surfaces, the presence of different materials layers), pXRF equipment calibration (difficulties to find and/or buy several standards in the concentration range of the samples) [51,52,53,54] . In this study, although the laboratorymade pXRF equipment employed has a fixed geometry and was used in a benchtop stand, the samples have different shapes and sizes in which make the positioning of the pieces difficult for measuring (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Archaeological Samples Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%