1987
DOI: 10.1002/macp.1987.021880821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X‐ray investigations of liquid crystalline homo‐ and copolysiloxanes with paired mesogens

Abstract: X-ray scattering experiments on oriented polysiloxanes with paired mesogens and different distances between these swallow-tailed side groups show a remarkable dependence of the smectic monolayer thickness on the degree of dilution, whereas the interplanar distances of the side groups remain nearly constant. Due to the dominating interaction of the mesogenic moieties, the flexible main chain is forced to take part in the layer formation. A packing model is proposed to explain the results of the X-ray studies. F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
56
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[6] Similar observations could be expected from homeotropically oriented thin elastomer films, produced by photo-crosslinking of a surface aligned S A polymer. However, neither spontaneous shape changes at the smectic-isotropic phase transformation nor a significant impact of the oriented layer structure on the rubber elastic modulus were observed for these materials, [12][13][14][15][16][17] which is in clear contrast to the S A LSCEs presented in this study. For elastomer E1 with the lowest crosslinking density the layer compression modulus B ¼ 1.1 Â 10 7 N Á m À2 is significantly larger than those observed for conventional low molar mass liquid crystals, where B is typically in the order of 1-5 Â 10 6 N Á m À2 for low measuring frequencies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…[6] Similar observations could be expected from homeotropically oriented thin elastomer films, produced by photo-crosslinking of a surface aligned S A polymer. However, neither spontaneous shape changes at the smectic-isotropic phase transformation nor a significant impact of the oriented layer structure on the rubber elastic modulus were observed for these materials, [12][13][14][15][16][17] which is in clear contrast to the S A LSCEs presented in this study. For elastomer E1 with the lowest crosslinking density the layer compression modulus B ¼ 1.1 Â 10 7 N Á m À2 is significantly larger than those observed for conventional low molar mass liquid crystals, where B is typically in the order of 1-5 Â 10 6 N Á m À2 for low measuring frequencies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…The wide angle diffuse band at about 4.6 Å corresponds to the average distance between the mesogenic groups and is characteristic for a disordered smectic phase (A or C) (De Vries 28) ). The diffuse band at about 7.5 Å may be related with the siloxane main chain (Diele et al 29) ). The comparison of the smectic layer thickness d with the length L of the repeating unit of each polymer measured on CPK models with the spacers in all-trans conformation (Tab.…”
Section: Mesomorphic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most of the SCLCP's described in the literature including those prepared by ROMP are just bearing one mesogenic moiety per repeating unit in the polymer. Exceptions are polymers with paired mesogens synthesized by using malonic esters, for example, which are then 0 1995, Hiithig & Wepf Verlag, Zug CCC 1022-1352/95/$10.00 linked to the polymerizable group 13). We found an easy synthetic route to connect two pendant mesogenic moities directly to the polymerizable group namely by employing the (+)-exo, endo-norbornene-2,3-dicarboxylic acid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%