1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb03518.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X‐ray measurements of gill‐arch movements in filter‐feeding bream, Abramis brama (Cyprinidae)

Abstract: The technique of X-ray cinematography was used to study pharyngeal movements in Abramis brama (L.). The theoretical and practical problems in X-ray cinematography of feeding fish are discussed, as well as criteria for the selection of images suited for detailed measurements.Respiration and filter-feeding on Daphnia pulex (length c. 1 mm) show different gill arch movement patterns in bream. Slits between gill-arches are kept smaller during filter-feeding. In addition, during filter-feeding, this inter-arch dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This low percentage is achieved by the intra-oral sorting of food and non-food in a repetitive mechanical process by which food is gradually cleaned (Sibbing, 1988;Sibbing & Nagelkerke, 2001). Mucus secretion to fix fine particles and organisms is also important in this process (Hoogenboezem et al, 1991;Hoogenboezem & Van den Boogart, 1993;Sanderson et al, 1996). Together with specialised morphological structures and the unique configurations of the oral cavity and gill arches, it is important in prey size selection and, thus, at least for the fish examined in this study, in their ability to feed effectively on specific sizes of their nematode prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This low percentage is achieved by the intra-oral sorting of food and non-food in a repetitive mechanical process by which food is gradually cleaned (Sibbing, 1988;Sibbing & Nagelkerke, 2001). Mucus secretion to fix fine particles and organisms is also important in this process (Hoogenboezem et al, 1991;Hoogenboezem & Van den Boogart, 1993;Sanderson et al, 1996). Together with specialised morphological structures and the unique configurations of the oral cavity and gill arches, it is important in prey size selection and, thus, at least for the fish examined in this study, in their ability to feed effectively on specific sizes of their nematode prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The branchial apparatus determines the mesh size of the gill filters and hence the minimum size of the retained particles (Hoogenboezem etal., 1991). For bottom-feeding fishes, the branchial apparatus is uniquely adapted with regard to several crucial morphological characteristics (Hoogenboezem et al, 1991). Thus, the mean inter-raker distance on the first and second gill arch of C. carpio (3-12 cm L j) is 83-164 pm compared with 129-537 p m in G. gobio (2.5-12 cm LT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second hypothesis is whether the functioning of the filter is related to success in zooplankton-rich environments. These relations have been investigated for bream by Hoogenboezem et al (1990Hoogenboezem et al ( , 1991.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blackfish, therefore, should be able to feed efficiently on planktonic patches in either normoxic or hypoxic areas of Clear Lake . In contrast, a European cyprinid, the common bream, apparently filters particles directly with movable rakers between adjacent gill arches, yet also inhabits eutrophic lakes (Hoogenboezem et al 1990(Hoogenboezem et al ,1991 . Is filtering efficiency compromised during hypoxic exposure in species such as common bream?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%