2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2007.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray metrology for high-k atomic layer deposited HfxZr1−xO2 films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the interfacial layer between the high-k and Si is estimated from the difference in thickness values obtained by ellipsometry and XRR measurement as previously reported. 13 Figure 1b compares the thickness of interfacial layers for as-deposited and annealed films. For as-deposited films, interfacial layer thicknesses increase slightly from ϳ10 to 11 Å for HfO 2 and Hf x Zr 1−x O 2 ͑x = 0.25-0.75͒ to 12.6 Å for ZrO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the interfacial layer between the high-k and Si is estimated from the difference in thickness values obtained by ellipsometry and XRR measurement as previously reported. 13 Figure 1b compares the thickness of interfacial layers for as-deposited and annealed films. For as-deposited films, interfacial layer thicknesses increase slightly from ϳ10 to 11 Å for HfO 2 and Hf x Zr 1−x O 2 ͑x = 0.25-0.75͒ to 12.6 Å for ZrO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the electrical data presented here and elsewhere (5,6) we propose it is not possible for interface SiO 2 to increase significantly during the DADA process and simultaneously provide 1-2 Å lower EOT. We did, however, seek to measure the interface on a series of samples for physical analysis by using a combination of spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) with XRR (11). In this measurement we treat the HfO 2 and the interface layer as a single dielectric stack, and allow the ellipsometer to fit the thickness of the dielectric stack and the refractive index over the spectral range using a standard HfO 2 model for the layer.…”
Section: Interface Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subtraction of SE and XRR measured thickness was used to estimate the interfacial SiO 2 thickness. 39 XRR was also performed after postmetal anneal to estimate the resultant thickness of the HfO 2 layer, Ti-based metal gate, and oxidized thickness of the top surface of the metal layer (TiO 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%