2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abaab9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Ray Observations of a [C ii]-bright, z = 6.59 Quasar/Companion System

Abstract: We present deep Chandra observations of PSO J231.6576−20.8335, a quasar at redshift z = 6.59 with a nearby (∼8 proper kpc) companion galaxy. ALMA observed both the quasar and companion to be bright in [C II], and the system has significant extended Lyα emission around the quasar, suggesting that a galaxy merger is ongoing. Unlike previous studies of two similar systems, and despite observing the system with Chandra for 140 ks, we do not detect the companion in X-rays. The quasar itself is detected, but only 13… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that this emission is not driven by a source with an extreme power-law spectral index (Γ  5), PJ352−15 is not host to the most X-ray luminous jets in the z > 2 universe. In contrast, for a steeper spectral slope, the high predicted luminosity is caused by extrapolating a poorly constrained spectrum into unobserved energy ranges (e.g., Connor et al 2020) and is not indicative of an expected relation between Γ and L 2-10 . As can be seen in Figure 3, PJ352−15 is not an outlier in radio-loudness among the broad population of quasars; the only reason we would expect this emission to be large is due to the (1 + z) 4 scaling of the CMB energy density.…”
Section: Properties Of the Extended Emissionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that this emission is not driven by a source with an extreme power-law spectral index (Γ  5), PJ352−15 is not host to the most X-ray luminous jets in the z > 2 universe. In contrast, for a steeper spectral slope, the high predicted luminosity is caused by extrapolating a poorly constrained spectrum into unobserved energy ranges (e.g., Connor et al 2020) and is not indicative of an expected relation between Γ and L 2-10 . As can be seen in Figure 3, PJ352−15 is not an outlier in radio-loudness among the broad population of quasars; the only reason we would expect this emission to be large is due to the (1 + z) 4 scaling of the CMB energy density.…”
Section: Properties Of the Extended Emissionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Data reduction was performed using the Chandra Interactive Analysis of Observations software package (CIAO; Fruscione et al 2006) v4.11 with CALDB version 4.8.4.1. Reduction followed standard procedures (e.g., Connor et al 2020), beginning with reprocessing using the chandra_repro script with standard grade, status, and good time filters and with VFAINT background cleaning. As part of the standard reprocessing, events were processed with the Energy Dependent Subpixel Event Repositioning (EDSER) routine (Li et al 2004); because of this reprocessing of the on-axis observations, and to enable more detailed physical modeling, all X-ray images in this work are presented at half-pixel (0 246) resolution (and all images presented are of the combined seven observations).…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent deep X-ray observations of some of the above sources did not reveal potentially obscured quasars. To date, there is no strong evidence that these obscured companions of z ∼ 6 quasars are obscured AGN (Connor et al 2020;Vito et al 2021).…”
Section: Number Of Qso Pairs As a Constraint On Massive Bh Origins And Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies of the X-ray properties of these systems are still limited. There are ∼ 30 quasars detected in X-rays at z > 6 (e.g., Shemmer et al 2006;Page et al 2014;Moretti et al 2014;Ai et al 2017;Gallerani et al 2017;Nanni et al 2017Nanni et al , 2018Bañados et al 2018;Vito et al 2019a;Connor et al 2019Connor et al , 2020Wang et al 2021) among more than 200 quasars known at this redshift, and only seven at z > 6.5 with X-ray detections (e.g., Page et al 2014;Vito et al 2019a;Bañados et al 2018;Connor et al 2020;Pons et al 2020;Wang et al 2021). Due to their extreme distances, the observed X-ray emission of these quasars is very faint, and only four z > 6 quasars are detected with more than 100 net counts (Page et al 2014;Ai et al 2017;Nanni et al 2017;Vito et al 2019a), which limits detailed investigations of their X-ray spectral properties and any correlations with other quasar properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%