2014
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2013.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray phase imaging: from synchrotron to hospital

Abstract: With the aim of clinical applications of X-ray phase imaging based on Talbot–Lau-type grating interferometry to joint diseases and breast cancer, machines employing a conventional X-ray generator have been developed and installed in hospitals. The machine operation especially for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis is described, which relies on the fact that cartilage in finger joints can be depicted with a dose of several milligray. The palm of a volunteer observed with 19 s exposure (total scan time: 32 s) is re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
62
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of SAXS and WAXS in vivo is also very difficult due to the high X-ray dose required for signal detection, because the primary X-ray beam is blocked and the signal is only generated from the scattered X-ray photons, which are several orders of magnitude less than the transmitted ones. However, X-ray phase-contrast methods based on gratingbased dark-field imaging [164,288] could be more easily adopted to be used in vivo in animals [221,289] and eventually in humans [290,291], whereas they can also be combined with standard X-ray absorption methods [223,292]. Their use in providing information on ultrastructure organization [161,169], by exploiting ultrastructure orientation-dependent signal modulations [168,293], is expected to rise in the future, as these methods have not been adequately explored to date [169].…”
Section: In Vivo Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of SAXS and WAXS in vivo is also very difficult due to the high X-ray dose required for signal detection, because the primary X-ray beam is blocked and the signal is only generated from the scattered X-ray photons, which are several orders of magnitude less than the transmitted ones. However, X-ray phase-contrast methods based on gratingbased dark-field imaging [164,288] could be more easily adopted to be used in vivo in animals [221,289] and eventually in humans [290,291], whereas they can also be combined with standard X-ray absorption methods [223,292]. Their use in providing information on ultrastructure organization [161,169], by exploiting ultrastructure orientation-dependent signal modulations [168,293], is expected to rise in the future, as these methods have not been adequately explored to date [169].…”
Section: In Vivo Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The reverse scenario is also possible.) Although research is underway, phase-contrast CT technology currently is limited to very small imaging fields of view, does not operate at clinical CT energies (up to 140 keV), and requires additional acquisitions to obtain the requisite data, which may increase dose and/or extend the data collection time [79, 81]. …”
Section: Ct Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has demonstrated superior contrast and visibility compared to conventional absorption xray imaging and has shown potential in many applications from biomedicine to materials science. 4 Among different XPCI methods, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] we focus on the edge illumination (EI) technique, 13 which could extend the capability of extracting phase information to common laboratory x-ray sources. 14 This extension, sometimes referred to as coded-aperture (CA) XPCI, has a non-interferometric nature with a simple setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%