2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray radiation and development inhibition of Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X‐ray irradiation of the congeneric species H. armigera has shown that all life stages of H. armigera achieved complete inhibition of emergence after 200 Gy for eggs and 100 Gy for larvae, and no viable F1 eggs after 100‐Gy treatment of pupae and 500‐Gy treatment of mixed‐sex adults (Kim et al ). The major difference between H. assulta and H. armigera lies in the observation of complete inhibition of viable F1 eggs at 200 Gy for H. assulta pupae and mixed‐sex adults, whereas only 100 Gy was required for H. armigera pupae, although 500 Gy treatment was required for H. armigera mixed‐sex adults (Kim et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…X‐ray irradiation of the congeneric species H. armigera has shown that all life stages of H. armigera achieved complete inhibition of emergence after 200 Gy for eggs and 100 Gy for larvae, and no viable F1 eggs after 100‐Gy treatment of pupae and 500‐Gy treatment of mixed‐sex adults (Kim et al ). The major difference between H. assulta and H. armigera lies in the observation of complete inhibition of viable F1 eggs at 200 Gy for H. assulta pupae and mixed‐sex adults, whereas only 100 Gy was required for H. armigera pupae, although 500 Gy treatment was required for H. armigera mixed‐sex adults (Kim et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among immature larval stages, the larvae are more likely to reside inside paprika. However, we selected pupae as the experimental stage because pupae can accidentally reside within the paprika box after pupation from included larvae and they are most resistant to irradiation among the immature stages (Kim et al ; Park et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since electron beam irradiation induces abnormal reproduction and development in insect pests depending on the insect species and stage of development, a large amount of basic data is required for ionizing radiation to be utilized for quarantine disinfection. In a previous study, many researchers reported the effects of gamma-ray, X-ray, and electron beam irradiation on Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) (Diptera: Agromyzidae), Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Frankliniella intonsa (Trybom) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), and Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [12][13][14][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. In addition, intracellular DNA was also damaged by ionizing irradiation [19,20,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ionizing radiation has been suggested as a useful alternative to MB due to the non‐development of resistance in insects, absence of pesticide residue in treated products, and applicability to packed commodities (Follett & Neven ; Kim et al . , ). This treatment has been used as an alternative to MB for phytosanitary purposes in many countries, including Australia, India, Thailand, Mexico, Vietnam, and the US (Follett ; Hallman ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%