2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray source variability study of the M 31 central field usingChandraHRC-I

Abstract: Context. The central field of the Andromeda galaxy (M 31) was monitored from 2006 to 2012 using the Chandra HRC-I detector (about 0.1−10 keV energy range) with the main aim of detecting X-rays from optical novae. We present a systematic analysis of all X-ray sources found in the 41 nova monitoring observations, along with 23 M 31 central field HRC-I observations available from the Chandra data archive starting in December 1999. Aims. Based on these observations, we studied the X-ray long-term variability of th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(142 reference statements)
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The better spatial resolution of Chandra allows to detect two different sources, about 8 ′′ apart, that contribute to the emission of the XMM-Newton XMM0042 source. Hofmann et al (2013) Note-We report the parameters of the best-fit constant+dips model of dipping XMM-Newton light curves of XMM0042 we analyzed. We show the observation number, number of dips, null hypothesis probability and the parameters as described in Section 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The better spatial resolution of Chandra allows to detect two different sources, about 8 ′′ apart, that contribute to the emission of the XMM-Newton XMM0042 source. Hofmann et al (2013) Note-We report the parameters of the best-fit constant+dips model of dipping XMM-Newton light curves of XMM0042 we analyzed. We show the observation number, number of dips, null hypothesis probability and the parameters as described in Section 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13, we considered four catalogues: X-ray sources from Stiele et al (2011), deeper X-ray sources from Hofmann et al (2013), planetary nebulae from Ciardullo et al (1989), and UV sources from Rosenfield et al (2012). The UV sources studied by Rosenfield et al (2012) trace the old stellar population, and they have the same radial distribution as low-mass X-ray binaries, which correspond to the majority of the X-ray sources in Hofmann et al (2013). The stellar kinematics has been studied by Saglia et al (2010) with long slits: bulge stars exhibit a rotation with a maximum velocity of 100 km s −1 along the major axis (considered at PA = 48 deg) and a zero (systemic) velocity along the minor axis).…”
Section: Point Sources and Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of sources is significantly larger for Hofmann et al (2013) than for Stiele et al (2011); the former work is more sensitive as the data are stacked over a longer period. The work of Rosenfield et al (2012) Main physical parameters corresponding to the 13 CO(2-1) gas (left panel) and the C 18 O(2-1) gas (right panel) detected in M31-I(3).…”
Section: Point Sources and Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding X-ray binaries, most sources have been classified based on correlations with lists of globular clusters, fewer through the detection of long-term variability (e. g. Trudolyubov et al 2006;Stiele et al 2008;Hofmann et al 2013), and only a few sources through the detection of short-term variability features, characteristic for X-ray binaries (Barnard et al 2003;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%