26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3397481.3450676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XAlgo: a Design Probe of Explaining Algorithms’ Internal States via Question-Answering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and was trained on a dataset of children's storybooks annotated by educational experts for supporting interactive storytelling. Another category of relevant work is on interactive question-answering systems that seek to retrieve answers to questions that users ask (e.g., [61,70]). These systems focus on answer retrieval (instead of question generation) and therefore have quite different goals from our work.…”
Section: Systems For Question-answer Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and was trained on a dataset of children's storybooks annotated by educational experts for supporting interactive storytelling. Another category of relevant work is on interactive question-answering systems that seek to retrieve answers to questions that users ask (e.g., [61,70]). These systems focus on answer retrieval (instead of question generation) and therefore have quite different goals from our work.…”
Section: Systems For Question-answer Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generated explanations and annotations with a feedback loop are combined to rectify wrong answers [197]. In [198], the authors have proposed XAlgo, an interactive algorithm explaining the system's internal state through question answering. Explanationbased conversational systems are designed to provide better explanations than conventional report-based systems for customer relationship management with an interactive approach for multisensory fusion [199].…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the different types of explainability one can choose, it appears to be always possible to frame the information provided by explainability with one or (sometimes) more questions. In fact, it is common to many works in the field [9,14,19,21,24,[27][28][29]35] the use of archetypal (e.g. why, who, how, when, etc.)…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Dhurandhar et al [9] clearly state that they designed CEM (a method for the generation of counterfactuals and other contrastive explanations) to answer the question "why is input x classified in class y?". Also, Rebanal et al [28] propose and studies an interactive approach where explaining is defined in terms of answering why-what-how questions.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation