2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/ab1db1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XAS studies of pressure-induced structural and electronic transformations in α-FeOOH

Abstract: Structural and electronic transformation taking place in α-FeOOH goethite have been studied by Fe K-edge x-ray absorption spectroscopy at pressures up to 50 GPa. These studies have shown the symmetrization of FeO6 octahedra coinciding with the Fe3+ high to low spin transition at pressure above ~45 GPa. Our data are in excellent agreement with the results of recent single crystal XRD and Mössbauer spectroscopy studies (Xu et al 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 175501), supporting the H-bonds symmetrization in iron oxy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bulk α‐Fe 2 O 3 and nanosized FM show similar prepeak (1s to 3d transition) at 7115.4 eV, while the obvious change is observed for ultrafine FTMC with the prepeak position shifting toward lower energy of 7114.7 eV ( Figure a), indicating the spin transition from high‐spin Fe(III) to low‐spin state . Meanwhile, the shoulder peak (Figure S7 of the Supporting Information, labeled as A) of FTMC shifts toward higher energy from 7181 eV (bulk α‐Fe 2 O 3 and FM) to 7189 eV and becomes wider, which is correlated to the reduction of FeO bond distances . The EXAFS (extended X‐ray absorption fine structure) R‐space Fourier transform signals of FeFe and FeOFe/FeOO shell weaken gradually from bulk to nanosized, and then ultrafine particles (Figure 2b), confirming the gradually reduced coordination number of the shells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bulk α‐Fe 2 O 3 and nanosized FM show similar prepeak (1s to 3d transition) at 7115.4 eV, while the obvious change is observed for ultrafine FTMC with the prepeak position shifting toward lower energy of 7114.7 eV ( Figure a), indicating the spin transition from high‐spin Fe(III) to low‐spin state . Meanwhile, the shoulder peak (Figure S7 of the Supporting Information, labeled as A) of FTMC shifts toward higher energy from 7181 eV (bulk α‐Fe 2 O 3 and FM) to 7189 eV and becomes wider, which is correlated to the reduction of FeO bond distances . The EXAFS (extended X‐ray absorption fine structure) R‐space Fourier transform signals of FeFe and FeOFe/FeOO shell weaken gradually from bulk to nanosized, and then ultrafine particles (Figure 2b), confirming the gradually reduced coordination number of the shells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[8,12] Meanwhile, the shoulder peak ( Figure S7 of the Supporting Information, labeled as A) of FTMC shifts toward higher energy from 7181 eV (bulk α-Fe 2 O 3 and FM) to 7189 eV and becomes wider, which is correlated to the reduction of FeO bond distances. [13] The EXAFS (extended X-ray absorption fine structure) R-space Fourier transform signals of FeFe and FeOFe/FeOO shell weaken gradually from bulk to nanosized, and then ultrafine particles (Figure 2b the appearance of abundant surface unsaturated coordinated Fe due to the very small particle size. [14] Importantly, the intensity increase of first shell (FeO peak) and the shrinkage of unit cell volume of ultrafine α-Fe 2 O 3 in FTMC are in good agreement with the difference between low-spin and high-pin α-Fe 2 O 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area labeled A is the pre-peak region which is related to the electronic state and structural environment of Fe. 36 Compared with α-Fe 2 O 3 , the pre-peak of FPD-2 shifts toward lower energy (Fig. 3d), suggesting the transition from the high spin state of Fe III to the low spin state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…3d), suggesting the transition from the high spin state of Fe III to the low spin state. 36,37 Moreover, the shoulder peak (labeled B in Fig. S4†) in FPD-2 moves toward higher energy and becomes a little bit wider than that of α-Fe 2 O 3 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Iron oxyhydroxide (FeOOH) is among the most common hydrous minerals on the Earth’s surface and in its interior. , At ambient conditions, goethite (α-FeOOH, space group Pnma ) is the most stable and comprises double chains of edge-shared octahedra that form 2 × 1 channels hosting hydrogen bonds . Because a proton-centered symmetrization of hydrogen bonding is expected to present in the high-pressure phase (ε-FeOOH, space group P 2 1 mn ) and the similar structural features have been reported to occur in the high-pressure phase of AlOOH, which is isostructural with ε-FeOOH, the previous high-pressure research studies about goethite mainly focused on the structural stability and the behavior of hydrogen bonds by the methods of X-ray diffraction (XRD), infrared spectra (IR), Raman spectroscopy, Mössbauer spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and first-principles calculations. ,, Although the electrical studies of goethite are very important for us to understand the mantle mineralogy, there are only a few studies on electrical conductivity. Until recently, there have been few reports on the high-pressure electrical conductivity of goethite. ,, Liu et al conducted the electrical impedance and Raman studies on goethite and reported two pressure-induced structural phase transitions at 7 and 20 GPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%