2012
DOI: 10.1021/ac300698c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XCMS Online: A Web-Based Platform to Process Untargeted Metabolomic Data

Abstract: Recently, interest in untargeted metabolomics has become prevalent in the general scientific community among an increasing number of investigators. The majority of these investigators, however, do not have the bioinformatic expertise that has been required to process metabolomic data by using command-line driven software programs. Here we introduce a platform to process untargeted metabolomic data that uses an intuitive graphical interface and does not require installation or technical expertise. This platform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
892
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,141 publications
(899 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
892
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw data files obtained from LC‐MS experiments were converted to the mzData format using Agilent Masshunter software, grouped into directories by population, and then uploaded to the XCMS Online platform (Tautenhahn, Patti, Rinehart, & Siuzdak, 2012) for automatic metabolite detection and alignment. Metabolite features—peaks defined by mass‐to‐charge ratio (m/z), retention time (RT), and intensity—were extracted with optimized parameters: centWave method, minimum–maximum peak width = 8 and 30, signal‐to‐noise threshold = 30, mzdiff = 0.01, prefilter peaks = 3, prefilter intensity = 2,000, and noise filter = 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raw data files obtained from LC‐MS experiments were converted to the mzData format using Agilent Masshunter software, grouped into directories by population, and then uploaded to the XCMS Online platform (Tautenhahn, Patti, Rinehart, & Siuzdak, 2012) for automatic metabolite detection and alignment. Metabolite features—peaks defined by mass‐to‐charge ratio (m/z), retention time (RT), and intensity—were extracted with optimized parameters: centWave method, minimum–maximum peak width = 8 and 30, signal‐to‐noise threshold = 30, mzdiff = 0.01, prefilter peaks = 3, prefilter intensity = 2,000, and noise filter = 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A preliminary PCA using autoscaled distances of individual peak areas and a distance to model (DModX) test (implemented in XCMS) detected individual UM19 as a significant outlier sample (possibly due to extraction error) to be removed. As one metabolite may give rise to multiple peaks including isotope, adduct, or fragment peaks, the 2,785 peaks were further grouped by peak intensity correlation and RT similarity using built‐in procedures from the XCMS pipeline (Tautenhahn et al., 2012). This resulted in 377 metabolites, which were represented by the largest peak within each group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak identification used the NIST 2005 Mass Spectra Library V2.1. Chromatographic data was processed using XCMS Online from the Scripps Center for Metabolomics 26. Linear Discriminant Analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All solvents contained 0.1% formic acid. Total ion chromatograms were analyzed with XCMS software (45) available online at the Scripps Center for Metabolomics (93).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%