“…(i) the distinction between the perceived (external) )objet* and the (internal) )content* of the corresponding perceptual experience; (ii) the asymmetric implication between perceptions and perceptual experiences; 7 (iii) the constraint that stipulates that the perception of some object take places iff the corresponding perceptual experience is satisfied, i.e., iff the object causes this perceptual experience (see, e.g., Grice, 1961;Anscombe, 1965;Searle, 1983;Pacherie, 2000). In addition, I will assume that an )aspectualization* process derives the perceptual content from the perceived object (see Clementz, 2000): The assumption that perceptions and perceptual experiences are related this way follows from a more general rejection of the so-called )disjunctive* theory of perceptual reports (as defended by Hinton, 1967;Snowdon, 1981;Putnam, 1999;Martin, 2004). Non-Intentional theories of perception can (and, in my view, must) leave room for a comparable asymmetry (Spivey and Geng, 2001).…”