2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00958-7_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XML Multimedia Retrieval: From Relevant Textual Information to Relevant Multimedia Fragments

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we are interested in XML multimedia document retrieval, whose aim is to find relevant multimedia components (i.e. XML fragments containing another media than text) that focus on the user needs. The work described here is carried out with images, but can be extended to any other media. We propose an XML multimedia fragment retrieval approach based on two steps. In a first step, we search for relevant images and then we retrieve the best multimedia fragments corresponding to these images… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we presented our CBA method (Torjmen et al, 2009), which implicitly exploits the XML content and structure for ME retrieval. This method consists in:…”
Section: Cba Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we presented our CBA method (Torjmen et al, 2009), which implicitly exploits the XML content and structure for ME retrieval. This method consists in:…”
Section: Cba Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The first one (called CBA) (Torjmen et al, 2009) is based on an implicit use of textual and structural context of MEs. Relevance scores of children, brothers and ancestors nodes of MEs are evaluated with a traditional XML retrieval system, and the impact of each of these sources of evidence on the ME relevance is then studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many general-purpose ras proposed in the literature, content-based [13,14]. Mo [25,26] organizing image then applying image search tree. Most of these approac meaning of an image is rare descriptions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compute the final score of each multimedia fragment, we then combine the score of their associated multimedia element (obtained in Section 3.1) with their initial score (obtained in Section 3.2). A simple combination was proposed in Torjmen, Pinel -Sauvagnat, and Boughanem (2009), which is considered in this paper as a baseline for comparison with two others combination methods, described in Section 3.3.2.…”
Section: Multimedia Fragments Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As proposed in Torjmen et al (2009), a simple way to evaluate the score S(mf, q) of each ancestor and descendant of one or more multimedia elements is to linearly combine its initial score obtained by the XFIRM system (S XFIRM (mf, q)) and the scores of the associated multimedia elements:…”
Section: Simple Combinationmentioning
confidence: 99%