2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XpsE oligomerization triggered by ATP binding, not hydrolysis, leads to its association with XpsL

Abstract: GspE belongs to a secretion NTPase superfamily, members of which are involved in type II/IV secretion, type IV pilus biogenesis and DNA transport in conjugation or natural transformation. Predicted to be a cytoplasmic protein, GspE has nonetheless been shown to be membrane‐associated by interacting with the N‐terminal cytoplasmic domain of GspL. By taking biochemical and genetic approaches, we observed that ATP binding triggers oligomerization of Xanthomonas campestris XpsE (a GspE homolog) as well as its asso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
68
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
9
68
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The assembly of some well investigated polymerization ATPases, such as GspE from Vibrio cholerae and TrbB from Helicobacter pylori requires ATP (34,35). In contrast the assembly of the PilF complex in T. thermophilus does not require ATP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assembly of some well investigated polymerization ATPases, such as GspE from Vibrio cholerae and TrbB from Helicobacter pylori requires ATP (34,35). In contrast the assembly of the PilF complex in T. thermophilus does not require ATP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XcpR contains a conserved Walker A-box motif that was shown to be indispensable for its function (Turner et al, 1993). Binding of ATP was recently shown to trigger oligomerization of the X. campestris XcpR homologue XpsE (Shiue et al, 2006) probably into hexamers (Crowther et al, 2005;Savvides et al, 2003). Knowledge of the role of XcpS in the secreton and its interactions with other Xcp components is rather limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-crystallization of the N-terminal region of EpsE and the cytoplasmic domain of EpsL (Abendroth et al, 2005) further supports the proposition that the N-terminal region of GspE interacts directly with the cytoplasmic domain of GspL. Shiue et al (2006) recently demonstrated that the X. campestris pv. campestris XpsE associated with the cytoplasmic domain of XpsL as hexamer in an ATP binding-dependent manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Not until recently, ATPase activity, albeit weak, was demonstrated in both the V. cholerae EpsE and the X. campestris pv. campestris XpsE (Camberg and Sandkvist, 2005;Shiue et al, 2006). Each was stimulated by cytoplasmic domain of its respective interactive partner EpsL or XpsL (Shiue et al, 2006;Camberg et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%