2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XXL-HSC: Link between AGN activity and star formation in the early Universe (z⩾ 3.5)

Abstract: In this work, our aim is to investigate the star formation rate (SFR) of the host galaxies of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in the early Universe. To this end, we constructed a sample of 149 luminous (L 2−10keV > 10 44 erg s −1 ) X-ray AGNs at z ≥ 3.5 selected in three fields with different depths and observed areas from the Chandra COSMOS Legacy survey, XMM-XXL North, and eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey. We built their spectral energy distributions (SED) using the available multi-wavelength photometry f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been applied by Shimizu et al (2015Shimizu et al ( , 2017 in hard (14-195 keV) X-ray selected AGN from the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) and more recently by Mountrichas et al (2021cMountrichas et al ( , 2022c. The limitation of this method is the available number of reference galaxies at a given M , z bin (Pouliasis et al 2022). Here, we compare the SFR of X-ray AGN with that of normal galaxies.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Normalised Star-formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been applied by Shimizu et al (2015Shimizu et al ( , 2017 in hard (14-195 keV) X-ray selected AGN from the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) and more recently by Mountrichas et al (2021cMountrichas et al ( , 2022c. The limitation of this method is the available number of reference galaxies at a given M , z bin (Pouliasis et al 2022). Here, we compare the SFR of X-ray AGN with that of normal galaxies.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Normalised Star-formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value has been used in previous studies (e.g. Masoura et al 2018;Buat et al 2021;Mountrichas et al 2022c,a;Koutoulidis et al 2022;Pouliasis et al 2022) and is based on visual inspection of the SEDs. This requirement was met by 78% of the sources.…”
Section: Selection Criteria and Final Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have employed these ranges for the selection of reliable SFR and M * estimations while leveraging the CIGALE code (e.g. Mountrichas et al 2021aMountrichas et al ,c, 2022cMountrichas et al ,a,b, 2023Mountrichas & Shankar 2023;Buat et al 2021;Koutoulidis et al 2022;Pouliasis et al 2022). Mountrichas et al (2021c) explored variations in the range, considering 0.1−0.33 for the lower limit and 3−10 for the upper limit.…”
Section: Selection Criteria and Final Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through this analysis, the reliability of the obtained estimations for the physical parameters was estimated. A full description of this process can be found in a paper by Boquien et al (2019; see also Ciesla et al 2015Ciesla et al , 2016Toba et al 2019bToba et al , 2020aPouliasis et al 2022).…”
Section: Mock Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%