1992
DOI: 10.1080/17843286.1992.11718205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Y A-T-Il En Belgique Un Accroissement De Resistance D’Escherichia Coli Considere Comme Bacterie De Reference Vis-A-Vis De L’Association Amoxicilline/Acide Clavulanique?

Abstract: The difficulties encountered in measuring the susceptibility of the association amoxicillin/clavulanate can be a cause for disagreements between laboratories. With an inoculum standardized at 10(4) CFU/spot, the resistance level of E. coli approaches 10%. If the variety of current methods is taken into account, the evaluation of a resistance increase can only be an internal one, specific for each laboratory, provided that methods do not change in the course of time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This probably explains the wide range of frequencies of resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid that have been reported for amoxicillinresistant E. coli, including 3% for Spanish isolates collected from 1983 to 1988 (23), 10% for isolates collected in Belgium (38), 28% for isolates collected in Spain (8), 33% for strains collected in 1993 in Clermont-Ferrand, France (10), 35% for American strains collected in 1992 (12), and 41% for strains collected in Hong Kong from 1984 to 1988 (14). In the present study, we found about 11% of amoxicillin-resistant strains to be resistant to the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid by disk diffusion tests, but 71% of these were subsequently shown to be moderately susceptible rather than resistant on the basis of MICs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This probably explains the wide range of frequencies of resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid that have been reported for amoxicillinresistant E. coli, including 3% for Spanish isolates collected from 1983 to 1988 (23), 10% for isolates collected in Belgium (38), 28% for isolates collected in Spain (8), 33% for strains collected in 1993 in Clermont-Ferrand, France (10), 35% for American strains collected in 1992 (12), and 41% for strains collected in Hong Kong from 1984 to 1988 (14). In the present study, we found about 11% of amoxicillin-resistant strains to be resistant to the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid by disk diffusion tests, but 71% of these were subsequently shown to be moderately susceptible rather than resistant on the basis of MICs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has been noted that difficulties encountered in measuring susceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid can cause disagreements between laboratories and that evaluation of increased resistance is specific for each laboratory (38). This probably explains the wide range of frequencies of resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid that have been reported for amoxicillinresistant E. coli, including 3% for Spanish isolates collected from 1983 to 1988 (23), 10% for isolates collected in Belgium (38), 28% for isolates collected in Spain (8), 33% for strains collected in 1993 in Clermont-Ferrand, France (10), 35% for American strains collected in 1992 (12), and 41% for strains collected in Hong Kong from 1984 to 1988 (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%