Yeni̇ Bi̇r Toplum Kuram Di̇nami̇ği̇: Prati̇k-Rasyonelli̇k

Çamlı, Ahmet Yavuz

doi:10.33707/akuiibfd.622982

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Individuals do not act vis a vis emotions and traditions. Furthermore, they do not use subjective values and judgements [25]. According to Weber, formal rationality is the best in capitalist economic activities.…”

Section: Rational Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Study on Developing a Communicative Rational Action Scale

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to develop a Communicative Rational Action Scale and analyze its validity and reliability. The scale has been prepared for all administrators and especially for firm administrators based on Max Weber’s rationalizing theory and Jürgen Habermas’ communicative action theory. The scale reveals to what extent administrators’ behaviors are communicatively rational while deciding or acting. In total, 282 participants joined this study. The sample group consisted of senior administrators of 87 firms acting in Turkey’s different Organized Industrial Zones or Free Zones. Data were analyzed by the SPSS 21 and AMOS 22 programs. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were applied to the obtained data. In order to test item discrimination, total item correlations were calculated and items under the value of 0.40 were removed from the scale. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 21 articles and five factors. The correlation coefficient of the 21-article scale with a similar scale is 0.979 (p < 0.001). The Cronbach’s alpha value is 0.945 and the test–retest correlation parameter is r = 0.793 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, it was determined by confirmatory factor analysis that the Communicative Rational Action Scale has a good cohesion criterion, and it is a valid and reliable assessment instrument.

show abstract

Section: Rational Actionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Study on Developing a Communicative Rational Action Scale

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Üremeye Yardimci Teknoloji̇ Yasaklarina Karşilik Prati̇k-Rasyonel Davraniş

Evsel

2021

Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Turkey, using the third parties' bodies and gametes in the In Vitro Fertilization processes of married couples is banned and punished via some regulations in the field of ARTs. For this reason, it is claimed and supported by the field results in this paper that Turkish citizens were forced to apply for some ways in order to avoid any kind of punishment such as social exclusion and legal enforcements. This study claims that Turkish citizens are forced to appeal to illegal ways in order to avoid any kind of punishment and are forced to enact in accordance with the practical rationality definition of Weber. This study focuses on practical rational behaviors developed against social pressure and/or humiliation of childless people's environment about not being able to have children or requiring other bodies in order to have children. This focus of the researcher is supported by qualitative interviews with surrogate mothers, oocyte donors, couples who had their children via these ways and embryologists in 2018.

show abstract

Rawls’ın Siyasal Liberalizm’inde İktisadi Adalet

Alkan¹

2020

OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to analyze that J. Rawls' comprehensive theory in the context of justice and economic justice perspective that based on the theoretical sheaf of Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism that he explained with various reasons. Within the scope of purpose first will be given informations about the content of J. Rawls' Political Liberalism. Then will be contextualised the institutions that are considered necessary for stability in social organizations with liberal, democratic and constitutional structure which Rawls foreseen as well ordered. From this point of view will be examined the question of which principles can be considered as equitable and sustainable by social and economic inequalities by considering the principles of free and equal persons in the basic structure. Within the scope of drawn borders will be analyzed the concept of reasonable and rational political subject which will be described as establishing economic justice within the framework will be evaluated along with the ''reasonable'' and ''rational'' explanations of Rawls. Later on will be analyzed ''overlapping consensus'' and ''public reason'' definitions as the collective mind derived from the individual design that can resolve the conflicts and compromises created by political processes. Because of the theory put forward by Rawls the application of these concepts include elements that different in terms of religious, philosophical, moral but at the same time reasonable (or not) in the case of a large number of opposing doctrines that can make the basis of living together strong and functional. Based on these informations will be explained the section as the conclusion which is considered as the defense of theory and includes the responses of Rawls against Habermas's criticism. The analysis of the economic dimension of the work of Rawls' Political Liberalism presents anecdotes about the structure of heterogeneous societies that are common these times.

show abstract

Yeni̇ Bi̇r Toplum Kuram Di̇nami̇ği̇: Prati̇k-Rasyonelli̇k

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

A Study on Developing a Communicative Rational Action Scale

A Study on Developing a Communicative Rational Action Scale

Üremeye Yardimci Teknoloji̇ Yasaklarina Karşilik Prati̇k-Rasyonel Davraniş

Rawls’ın Siyasal Liberalizm’inde İktisadi Adalet

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About