Yield and Nitrogen Uptake of Bowl‐Seedling Machine‐Transplanted Rice with Slow‐Release Nitrogen Fertilizer

Miao, Xuekuan; Xing, Xiaoming; Ding, Yanfeng; Ke, Jian; Liu, Zhenghui; Tang, She; Ding, Chengqiang; Wang, Shaohua

doi:10.2134/agronj2015.0101

Cited by 37 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Results obtained agree with reports regarding N management for irrigated rice, where benefits from replacing soluble N sources by CRF were not seen (SLATON et al, 2009;MIAO et al, 2016). Unfavorable results regarding the use of covered sources can be explained by the reduction of its efficiency by soil flooding in the cultivation of irrigated rice.…”

Section: Veçozzi Et Alsupporting

confidence: 86%

Soil solution and plant nitrogen on irrigated rice under controlled release nitrogen fertilizers

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A study was conducted to evaluate the solubilization and nitrogen (N) use efficiency (NUE) of controlled release nitrogen fertilizers in irrigated rice, compared to urea. It was developed under semi-controlled conditions, including five treatments: Control, Splitted Urea (pre-sowing and topdressing), Pre-sowing urea, and Polymer Coated Urea (PCU) with 60-day and 90-day release. PCUs did not maintain high NH4 + and NO3 - levels in solution over a longer period than urea. NUE of PCUs was similar to uncoated urea, not increasing nutrient release in irrigated rice field.

show abstract

Section: Veçozzi Et Alsupporting

confidence: 86%

Soil solution and plant nitrogen on irrigated rice under controlled release nitrogen fertilizers

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A higher environmental temperature and greater moisture content could accelerate the nutrient release rate (Gu et al, 2011). If sulfur‐coated urea is applied entirely basally, it may cause a high N release rate at the early stage and an insufficient N supply at the late stage, which leads to low dry matter accumulation (Li et al, 2013; Miao et al, 2016). It is not well understood whether a shift in fertilization method from a single basal application to double fertilization (one for base and one for panicle) could compensate for the insufficient late N supply capacity.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Yield and N Utilization of Transplanted and Direct‐Seeded Rice with Controlled or Slow‐Release Fertilizer

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To understand the response of rice yield and N utilization to controlled or slow-release fertilizers (CSRFs) under directseeded or seedling-transplanted modes of rice production, a field experiment with rice variety Wuyunjing 23 was performed in 2013 and 2014. Five treatments, including two CSRFs: sulfur-coated urea (SCU) and resin-blending controlledrelease fertilizer (RBB), two fertilization modes: single basal application and a split "base-panicle" (BP) application, and conventional split fertilization (CONV) as a control, were conducted. The results showed that there was no improvement of yield for SCU application compared with CONV in the seedling-transplanted and direct-seeded modes in both years. The yield increasing effect of RBB was better than that of SCU under the two planting modes. The interaction effect between the planting mode and fertilizer treatment on the yield was significant. The yield of RBB BP treatment was the highest in seedling-transplanted fields, reaching 12.04 t ha -1 in 2013 and 13.44 t ha -1 in 2014. By contrast, the yield of RBB basal treatment was the highest in direct-seeded rice, although the difference among the treatments was not significant. The CSRF application (RBB basal , RBB BP , SCU BP ) increased the NUE in both the seedling-transplanted and direct-seeded fields. Except for the NUE of RBB basal , which was the highest for directseeded rice in 2013, the RBB BP treatment showed the highest NUE in seedling-transplanted and direct-seeded rice in both years. The results indicated that RBB increased the yield and NUE in both seedling-transplanted and direct-seeded modes, and the combined panicle urea and RBB was better in seedlingtransplanted fields, while a single basal application with RBB was better in direct-seeded rice. ).Abbreviations: BP, fertilizer split into base and panicle applications; CONV, conventional split fertilization; CSRF, controlled or slow release fertilizer; LAI, leaf area index; NUE, nitrogen use efficiency; RBB, resin blending controlled-release fertilizer; SCU, sulfur coated urea. core Ideas• CSRF application (RBB basal , RBB BP , SCU BP ) increased the NUE in both seedling-transplanted and direct-seeded fields. • Yield increase of resin-blending controlled-release fertilizer was better than that of sulfur-coated fertilizer under the two planting modes. • "Base-panicle" fertilization with RBB and urea was suitable for the seedling-transplanted mode. • A single basal application of RBB was suitable for direct-seeded mode for achieving the high yield.croP Ecology And PhysIology

show abstract

“…Huang et al (2006) reported that one-time application of controlled-release fertilizer prominently enhanced rice grain yield. Miao et al (2016) found that slow-release fertilizer blend was capable of meeting rice N demand and improving N use efficiency and grain yield. In the current study, we observed that, compared to conventional fertilizer, the application of controlledrelease fertilizer significantly increased rice eating quality while was unfavorable to the enhancement of brown and milled rice yield.…”

Section: Effect Of Controlled-release Fertilizer On Rice Grain Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Promoting fertilizer use efficiency and reducing its input have an important implication for the boost of economic and ecological benefits (Xing et al, 2015). Focusing on the hot issue, a numerous researches about the effects of controlledrelease fertilizer and the combined application of inorganic and organic fertilizers on physicochemical traits of soil and grain yield in rice have been conducted (Li et al, 2013;Peng et al, 2013;Miao et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2017; RESEARCH Moe et al, 2017). Wang et al (2012) found that a 4-yr application of pig-manure compost to crop fields demonstrated an enhancement in organic-C and N concentrations in soil.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moe et al (2017) reported that the combined application of inorganic fertilizer and organic manures was instrumental in decreasing the use of chemical fertilizer and improving N uptake in rice, resulting in better environment. Xing et al (2015) and Miao et al (2016) observed that an application of controlled-release fertilizer accompanied by tiller urea could increase the creation of photosynthetic matter, N use efficiency and grain yield in rice. All these literatures suggest that optimizing N fertilization application strategy through the use of chemical fertilizer in conjunction with organic fertilizer and controlled-release fertilizer appears to be feasible for reducing chemical fertilizer application rate and improving soil fertility and rice grain yield.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of different types of fertilizers application on rice grain quality

Liu

Lin

et al. 2019

Chil. j. agric. res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As expected, applications of organic fertilizer and controlled-release fertilizer are gradually varying traditional fertilization, being considered as important channels for substitution of conventional chemical-fertilizer. However, information regarding their effects on rice (Oryza sativa L.) grain quality remains limited. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of combined application of bio-organic fertilizer and conventional fertilizer (BOF+CF), combined application of organic fertilizer and conventional fertilizer (OF+CF), and application of controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) on rice processing quality, eating quality and nutritional quality with conventional fertilizer (CF) and no fertilizer (NF) as controls. The protein content of OF+CF treatment was increased by 4.67%, 3.29%, 2.61% and 22.66% when compared to BOF+CF, CRF, CF and NF. These results imply that, among all treatments, NF produced the highest rice eating quality followed by CRF and BOF+CF, and OF+CF made the highest nutritional quality followed by CF and CRF. When compared to CF, BOF+CF and NF treatments decreased protein content by 1.96% and 16.34%. Compared to CF, BOF+CF treatment markedly reduced aspartic acid, serine, glutamic acid, glycine, alanine, histidine, arginine, and proline contents in milled rice by 17.31, 14.71%, 16.39%, 16.67%, 20.69%, 11.77%, 18.42%, and 18.75%, respectively. The nutritional quality under NF and BOF+CF was significantly decreased when compared with CF, due to the reductions in protein content of milled rice and most amino acids contents of brown and milled rice. These results suggest that a kind of suitable fertilizer could be chosen from them as alternatives according to desired goal in high-quality rice production.

show abstract

Yield and Nitrogen Uptake of Bowl‐Seedling Machine‐Transplanted Rice with Slow‐Release Nitrogen Fertilizer

Cited by 37 publications

References 17 publications

Soil solution and plant nitrogen on irrigated rice under controlled release nitrogen fertilizers

Soil solution and plant nitrogen on irrigated rice under controlled release nitrogen fertilizers

Yield and N Utilization of Transplanted and Direct‐Seeded Rice with Controlled or Slow‐Release Fertilizer

Effects of different types of fertilizers application on rice grain quality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About