1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)80370-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield of ERCP tissue sampling of malignant biliary strictures by brush, forceps, and needle aspiration methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several investigators have therefore evaluated the increased sensitivity of a com bination of brush cytology and endobiliary forceps biopsy. In 251 cumulative patients, the sensitivity of this combina tion was 68%, whereas when used separately, brush cytol ogy and biopsy had a sensitivity of 41 % and 53% respec tively [2,3,22,23]. Our group has recently reported on the cumulative sensitivity of "triple tissue sampling", with brush cytology, FNA, and forceps biopsy [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have therefore evaluated the increased sensitivity of a com bination of brush cytology and endobiliary forceps biopsy. In 251 cumulative patients, the sensitivity of this combina tion was 68%, whereas when used separately, brush cytol ogy and biopsy had a sensitivity of 41 % and 53% respec tively [2,3,22,23]. Our group has recently reported on the cumulative sensitivity of "triple tissue sampling", with brush cytology, FNA, and forceps biopsy [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERCP brush cytology is still probably the most commonly used ERCP sampling technique [10], as it is easy and convenient to perform, but its sensitivity for malignant bile duct strictures ranges from 30 % to 69 % ± far less than ideal, although a few studies have reported higher sensitivities, particularly for detecting cholangiocarcinoma [11 ± 21]. Several studies suggest that ERCP-FNA is no better than other cytological techniques [22,23], although there have been some encouraging reports of higher sensitivity rates for cancer detection using forceps biopsy at ERCP [13,24,25]. It is reasonably evident that using more than one sampling method will improve the diagnostic yield of ERCP tissue collection ± as shown, for example, in an elegant prospective study evaluating the use of so-called ªtriple-tissueº sampling with brush cytology, FNA, and forceps biopsy [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study suggests that dilation of the strictures prior to brushing can increase the yield for cancer. Combining results of multiple modalities (brush cytology, biopsy, and fine-needle aspiration) can increase the sensitivity for diagnosing pancreatic cancer to 78% [102]. However, more recently, 148 consecutive patients undergoing brush cytology were evaluated [103•].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%