2013
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield of Routine Provocative Cardiac Testing Among Patients in an Emergency Department–Based Chest Pain Unit

Abstract: The American Heart Association recommends routine provocative cardiac testing in accelerated diagnostic protocols for coronary ischemia. The diagnostic and therapeutic yield of this approach are unknown. Objective: To assess the yield of routine provocative cardiac testing in an emergency department-based chest pain unit. Design and Setting: We examined a prospectively collected database of patients evaluated for possible acute coronary syndrome between March 4, 2004, and May 15, 2010, in the emergency departm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies of ED patients evaluated for chest pain found myocardial infarction rates around 10%, 12 although this may have decreased significantly over the past decade. 11 We do not have myocardial infarction data available for the study ED, but in a previous study of patients undergoing a chest pain protocol in our ED, 11.7% had positive provocative tests, 13 generally consistent with results from studies in other EDs. [14][15][16] Finally, since our survey was anonymous, we are unable to determine the number of unique physicians surveyed or correlate individual physician characteristics with responses beyond the simple demographic data reported.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Earlier studies of ED patients evaluated for chest pain found myocardial infarction rates around 10%, 12 although this may have decreased significantly over the past decade. 11 We do not have myocardial infarction data available for the study ED, but in a previous study of patients undergoing a chest pain protocol in our ED, 11.7% had positive provocative tests, 13 generally consistent with results from studies in other EDs. [14][15][16] Finally, since our survey was anonymous, we are unable to determine the number of unique physicians surveyed or correlate individual physician characteristics with responses beyond the simple demographic data reported.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…11,12 Our study demonstrated a similar yield with 9.0% of patients having ≥5% ischemic myocardium. Unlike these previous studies, a greater percentage of our patients with evidence of ischemia subsequently had invasive coronary angiography.…”
Section: Previous Studies Of Routine Provocative Testing To Risk Strasupporting
confidence: 70%
“…7,[10][11][12][13] As one example, a recent large retrospective analysis by Sandhu et al looked at an insurance claims database of over 900,000 ED chest pain patients with initial negative workups. The results showed no significant reduction in subsequent admissions for acute MIs in patients who underwent noninvasive cardiac testing for further risk stratification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%