Handbook of Indian Psychology 2008
DOI: 10.1017/upo9788175968448.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yoga Psychology: Theory and Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In positivism, the primary purpose of theories is to explain and predict the future status of dependent variables by referring to the “universal” laws (empirical regularities) established in previous research. For such explanations, positivists use the deductive‐nomological way of inference (Hempel, 1965; Hempel & Oppenheim, 1948) (for more on positivism, see Halfpenny, 1982/2015; Polkinghorne, 1983; Ray, 2000).…”
Section: What Is the Nature Of Theories In Psychology And How Do Theymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In positivism, the primary purpose of theories is to explain and predict the future status of dependent variables by referring to the “universal” laws (empirical regularities) established in previous research. For such explanations, positivists use the deductive‐nomological way of inference (Hempel, 1965; Hempel & Oppenheim, 1948) (for more on positivism, see Halfpenny, 1982/2015; Polkinghorne, 1983; Ray, 2000).…”
Section: What Is the Nature Of Theories In Psychology And How Do Theymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretivism (which is rooted in the old tradition of hermeneutics, phenomenology, and existentialism) is the paradigm that researchers in human and social sciences have elaborated upon as an alternative to positivism (for the history and a review of interpretivism/hermeneutics, see Ashworth & Chung, 2006; Bevir & Blakely, 2019; Polkinghorne, 1983; Ricœur, 1981; Schwandt, 2000; Taylor, 1971). The primary premise of this paradigm is that in the sociocultural worlds, human actions are driven by systems of collective meanings that are generated within these people’s communities and by the idiosyncratic meanings generated by individuals (Martin, 2002; Ricœur, 1981; Taylor, 1971).…”
Section: What Is the Nature Of Theories In Psychology And How Do Theymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-faceted system of Yoga refers to the means or process of realizing the self (Rao, 2011). It is primarily a pragmatic discipline, which includes both generalizable philosophical principles and specific practices that can be used for the transformation of the human condition towards perfection (Rao and Paranjpe, 2008). The process adopted may involve a path of predominantly unattached love and devotion (bhakti), discriminative knowledge (jnana) or selfless action (karma).…”
Section: Individual Learning From the Hindu Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Yoga and Samkhya, a person consists of two “components,” one material and one not (for details see Dasgupta, 1930 ; Chatterjee and Datta, 1984 ; Puligandla, 1997 ; Jha, 2008 ; Rao and Paranjpe, 2008 ). The material one, prakriti (roughly meaning nature), is composed of three “qualities,” the three gunas : sattva (purity), rajas (energy), and tamas (inertia).…”
Section: Cognition In Samkhya-yogamentioning
confidence: 99%