1993
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90592-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yohimbine-induced cutaneous drug eruption, progressive renal failure, and lupus-like syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patient was treated with corticosteroids and regained normal renal function within 2 wk. The authors concluded that this was yohimbine-induced systemic lupus erythematosus with resultant renal dysfunction (37).…”
Section: Pausinystalia Yohimbe (Yohimbe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient was treated with corticosteroids and regained normal renal function within 2 wk. The authors concluded that this was yohimbine-induced systemic lupus erythematosus with resultant renal dysfunction (37).…”
Section: Pausinystalia Yohimbe (Yohimbe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed initial improvement with use of oral prednisone corticosteroid and continued resolution with Eucerin cream with 1% hydrocortisone (body) and betamethasone valerate 0.1% cream (hands). 9 This account demonstrates that diffuse cutaneous reactions can occur as an acute response to drugs effective against ED.…”
Section: Adverse Eventsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To be included in the meta-analyses, reports had to identify the subjects as men with erectile disorder or impotence; include five or more subjects; report that yohimbine was administered orally, either by itself, or in combination with other medications; describe the dependent measure(s) employed to assess improvement; and provide information to allow derivation of improvement rate. Eight reports were excluded because they included fewer than five subjects (Friesen et al, 1993;Hollander and McCarley, 1992;Jacobsen, 1992;Pollack and Hammerness, 1993;Price and Grunhaus, 1990;Sandier and Aronson, 1993;Vickers et aL, 1993;Wolpowitz and Barnard, 1978). One additional report (Roberts and Sloboda, 1974) was excluded because its authors simply reanalyzed extant data already included.…”
Section: Sample Of Studies Included In Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 97%