You can judge a book by its cover: the sequel.A kernel of truth in predictive cheating detection

Verplaetse, Jan; Vanneste, Sven; Braeckman, Johan

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.006

Cited by 144 publications

(132 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

126

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The finding that the appearance of a strong negative response against non-cooperators (high K dec ) is the first crucial step towards the emergence of cooperation underlines the importance of the detection of cheating, which is apparently a widespread component of the maintenance of cooperation in human societies [32]. The recent empirical evidence showing that the appearance of The proportion of interactions where helping occurred and the probability of helping after receiving no help or help over the generations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cooperation among non-relatives evolves by state-dependent generalized reciprocity

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For decades, attempts to understand cooperation between non-kin have generated substantial theoretical and empirical interest in the evolutionary mechanisms of reciprocal altruism. There is growing evidence that the cognitive limitations of animals can hinder direct and indirect reciprocity because the necessary mental capacity is costly. Here, we show that cooperation can evolve by generalized reciprocity (help anyone, if helped by someone) even in large groups, if individuals base their decision to cooperate on a state variable updated by the outcome of the last interaction with an anonymous partner. We demonstrate that this alternative mechanism emerges through small evolutionary steps under a wide range of conditions. Since this state-based generalized reciprocity works without advanced cognitive abilities it may help to understand the evolution of complex social behaviour in a wide range of organisms.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cooperation among non-relatives evolves by state-dependent generalized reciprocity

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…served this ability (Verplaetse et al, 2007;Willis and Todorov, 2006). Trustworthiness detection might also use cues that are related to the interaction partners' personality and general disposition to be trustworthy.…”

Section: Seeing the Othermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whether actual trustworthiness can be reliably detected from faces is still controversial (Yamagishi et al, 2003;Verplaetse et al, 2007;Efferson and Vogt, 2013).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Seeing and knowing others: the impact of social ties on economic interactions

Hopfensitz¹

2017

Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…も，相互協力関係の形成において有効に機能しうる (Axelrod & Hamilton, 1981;Kuhlman & Marshello, 1975;Oskamp, 1971 (Brown et al, 2003;Oda, Nakagawa et al, 2009;Verplaetse et al, 2007) (Mehu, Grammer, & Dunbar, 2007;Shelley & Kuhlman, 2007 (Matsumoto, Haan, Gary, Theodorou, & CookeCarney, 1986) ，単純にポジティブな表情表出を利他性のシグナルと捉えることには議論の余地がある。この問題について，Schug, Matsumoto, Horita, Yamagishi, & Bonnet(2010) …”

unclassified

Accuracy of judgment about other's cooperative behavior:

Shinada¹,

Yamagishi²,

Tanida³

et al. 2010

The Japanese journal of psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cooperation in interdependent relationships is based on reciprocity in repeated interactions. However, cooperation in one-shot relationships cannot be explained by reciprocity. Frank, Gilovich, & Regan (1993) argued that cooperative behavior in one-shot interactions can be adaptive if cooperators displayed particular signals and people were able to distinguish cooperators from non-cooperators by decoding these signals. We argue that attractiveness and facial expressiveness are signals of cooperators. We conducted an experiment to examine if these signals influence the detection accuracy of cooperative behavior. Our participants (blind to the targetʼs behavior in a Trust Game) viewed 30-seconds video-clips. Each video-clip was comprised of a cooperator and a non-cooperator in a Trust Game. The participants judged which one of the pair gave more money to the other participant. We found that participants were able to detect cooperators with a higher accuracy than chance. Furthermore, participants rated male non-cooperators as more attractive than male cooperators, and rated cooperators more expressive than non-cooperators. Further analyses showed that attractiveness inhibited detection accuracy while facial expressiveness fostered it.Key words: altruist-detection, facial expression, attractiveness, cooperation, Trust Game. The Japanese Journal of Psychology

show abstract

You can judge a book by its cover: the sequel.A kernel of truth in predictive cheating detection

Cited by 144 publications

References 21 publications

Cooperation among non-relatives evolves by state-dependent generalized reciprocity

Cooperation among non-relatives evolves by state-dependent generalized reciprocity

Seeing and knowing others: the impact of social ties on economic interactions

Accuracy of judgment about other's cooperative behavior:

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About