2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

You gain some funding, you lose some freedom: The ironies of flood protection in Limburg (The Netherlands)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flood protection standards are generally higher in areas with high population density and potential losses (Kind, 2013). In comparison, protection levels up to 1/100 years are typical in most other developed countries (Wesselink et al, 2013). As a result of the high protection standards provided, population growth and economic progression has been able to continue, making the Netherlands one of the countries with the highest potential exposure to flooding globally (Jongman et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Flood Risk and Flood Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flood protection standards are generally higher in areas with high population density and potential losses (Kind, 2013). In comparison, protection levels up to 1/100 years are typical in most other developed countries (Wesselink et al, 2013). As a result of the high protection standards provided, population growth and economic progression has been able to continue, making the Netherlands one of the countries with the highest potential exposure to flooding globally (Jongman et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Flood Risk and Flood Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, upgrades of flood protection measures have been implemented in several steps. The current safety levels, measured in terms of the occurrence probability of floods the defences are designed to withstand, range from 1/250 to 1/11 250 years along the main rivers, and 1/4000 to 1/10 000 years along the coasts (Wesselink et al, 2013). Flood protection standards are generally higher in areas with high population density and potential losses (Kind, 2013).…”
Section: Flood Risk and Flood Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hegemony rests on assent and may even be actively courted (cf. Wesselink, Warner, & Kok, 2012). In fact, investee states may actively seek out investors.…”
Section: What Does a Hegemon Want? The Geopolitical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to Wesselink et al [34], loss of life is almost certain when flood defenses, such as levees, are breached and the internal area inundated. Some examples, among others of this type, may be found in the literature: large floods that affected the US Midwest along the Mississippi and Missouri rivers and their tributaries in 1993 and 1995, caused by levee failure [10,11,32]; the disastrous flooding of New Orleans provoked by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, also associated with a levee failure; and two important events that occurred in 1993 and 1995 [35], in The Netherlands, a low-lying country with approximately 20% of its area below sea level [36] where large polders have been constructed to protect the country against floods [32,37].…”
Section: Lowlands Levee Systems and River Restoration As An Alternativementioning
confidence: 99%