2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0193-3973(02)00126-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young children's understanding of disabilities: the influence of development, context, and cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
76
0
36

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
76
0
36
Order By: Relevance
“…Three instruments (Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children, 30 Acceptance Scale for Kindergarteners, 14,31 and Pictographic Scale 32,33 ) were excluded because they were developed for use with preschool-age children. One instrument (Children's Attitudes Towards Integrated Physical Education 34 ) was excluded because it measured attitudes towards integration rather than attitudes towards children with disabilities; one (Test of Attitudes Towards Children with Disabilities [35][36][37][38][39] ) was not used because there was insufficient information available; and four instruments 13,15,17,40 were excluded because they were devised by their authors for one or two specific studies, and because insufficient evidence of sound instrument development or psychometric properties was reported.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three instruments (Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children, 30 Acceptance Scale for Kindergarteners, 14,31 and Pictographic Scale 32,33 ) were excluded because they were developed for use with preschool-age children. One instrument (Children's Attitudes Towards Integrated Physical Education 34 ) was excluded because it measured attitudes towards integration rather than attitudes towards children with disabilities; one (Test of Attitudes Towards Children with Disabilities [35][36][37][38][39] ) was not used because there was insufficient information available; and four instruments 13,15,17,40 were excluded because they were devised by their authors for one or two specific studies, and because insufficient evidence of sound instrument development or psychometric properties was reported.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essa é a concepção em relação ao indivíduo com deficiência intelectual ainda vigente em nossa sociedade, reforçada pela mídia, que relaciona a deficiência ao apelo emocional e financeiro, como já foi discutido. Alguns estudos encontraram relatos de crianças que caracterizaram as pessoas com deficiência a partir de atributos negativos (Martins, 1999), apresentando uma visão do aluno com deficiência como dependente, improdutivo, necessitado de ajuda para todas atividades básicas (Marques et al, 1997) e sem perspectivas para o futuro (Magiati, Dockrell & Logotheti, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Τν γεγνλόο βέβαηα απηό κπνξεί λα ζπλδέεηαη θαη κε ην βαζκό θαηαλόεζεο ηεο αλαπεξίαο. Σηελ έξεπλα, ηέινο, ησλ Magiati, Dockrell, & Logotheti (2002) αλαδείρζεθε όηη γηα ηα παηδηά είλαη πην εύθνιν λα θαηαλνήζνπλ ηηο αηζζεηεξηαθέο θαη ζσκαηηθέο αλαπεξίεο. Φαξαθηεξηζηηθά, θάλεθε όηη ππήξρε πεξηνξηζκέλε γλώζε γηα ηε δπζιεμία, ηελ ππεξθηλεηηθόηεηα ελώ θαλέλα παηδί δελ γλώξηδε γηα ηνλ απηηζκό.…”
Section: ο «ηύπορ» ηηρ αναπηπίαρunclassified
“…Δπηπξόζζεηα, ζε άιιε έξεπλα (Magiati et al, 2002) ζρεηηθά κε ηελ ειηθία, δηαπηζηώζεθε όηη ηα κεγαιύηεξα παηδηά αλαθέξνληαλ ζην θνηλσληθό θαη ζπλαηζζεκαηηθό αληίθηππν ηνύ λα έρεη θαλείο ζσκαηηθή αλαπεξία, ελώ έθαλαλ πην ζαθείο αλαθνξέο ζε γλσζηηθά ειιείκκαηα πνπ ζπλδένληαη κε ηηο λνεηηθέο αλαπεξίεο. Σπλνιηθά, βέβαηα, πξέπεη λα ζεκεησζεί όηη πνιιά παηδηά αλέπηπμαλ απόςεηο πνπ ζρεηίδνληαλ κε ην ζηεξεόηππν ηεο «αλεκπνξηάο» γηα ηα άηνκα κε εηδηθέο αλάγθεο (Magiati et al, 2002).…”
Section: η ηλικίαunclassified