2021
DOI: 10.1037/tra0000662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Younger, more senior, and most vulnerable? Interaction effects of age and job seniority on psychological distress and quality of life among firefighters.

Abstract: Objectives: Firefighters are exposed to repeated traumatic events while the robustness of cumulative effects of repeated exposure to trauma on psychological distress among them are inconsistent. Considering the length of service and seniority are risk factors, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the interaction between age and seniority on psychological distress and quality of life among firefighters. Methods: Participants were 229 firefighters of the Hualien County Fire Bureau in Taiwan wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both outcomes are of paramount importance in a military context as exemplified by the problematic high levels of turnover among military personnel (Guibert, 2017;Handelsblatt, 2018;Heinecken, 2009;Legge, 2019;Richter, 2017;Szvircsev, Tresch, & Leuprecht, 2010) and the fact that safety behavior is especially important in a military context, which is heavily reliant of the compliance with appropriate and effective regulations (Martínez-Córcoles & Stephanou, 2017;Military Aviation Authority, 2020). However, as stated in the introduction, these conditions can be found in numerous other professions that rely on safety compliance behavior such as firefighters, police officers, private security personnel, construction workers, nurses, and other health care personnel (e.g., Ayodele et al, 2021;Charman & Bennett, 2021;De los Santos & Labrague, 2021;Goh et al, 2021;Seung, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021). Furthermore, there are many other professions for which turnover is not as high but for whom safety compliance is also of the upmost importance (e.g., people working on oil platforms, train drivers, air traffic controllers).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both outcomes are of paramount importance in a military context as exemplified by the problematic high levels of turnover among military personnel (Guibert, 2017;Handelsblatt, 2018;Heinecken, 2009;Legge, 2019;Richter, 2017;Szvircsev, Tresch, & Leuprecht, 2010) and the fact that safety behavior is especially important in a military context, which is heavily reliant of the compliance with appropriate and effective regulations (Martínez-Córcoles & Stephanou, 2017;Military Aviation Authority, 2020). However, as stated in the introduction, these conditions can be found in numerous other professions that rely on safety compliance behavior such as firefighters, police officers, private security personnel, construction workers, nurses, and other health care personnel (e.g., Ayodele et al, 2021;Charman & Bennett, 2021;De los Santos & Labrague, 2021;Goh et al, 2021;Seung, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021). Furthermore, there are many other professions for which turnover is not as high but for whom safety compliance is also of the upmost importance (e.g., people working on oil platforms, train drivers, air traffic controllers).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occupation of firefighting may be one of the most vulnerable globally because, as first responders, firefighters frequently witness injury or death, get injured, or even lose their lives in emergencies (Goh et al, 2021). In addition to the physical risk, firefighters do not receive adequate rest since the prompt reaction to potential disasters is part of their daily routine.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among risk factors against PTSD among firefighters, there are maladaptative coping styles [ 11 15 ], alienation, feelings of insecurity and lack of personal control [ 16 ], high neuroticism, and fear of dying on duty [ 17 ], anxiety sensitivity [ 18 , 19 ], negative emotionality [ 20 ], burnout [ 21 , 22 ], length of service and lower rank [ 10 , 14 , 23 25 ], previous high exposure to traumatic events and previous psychopathology [ 11 , 26 – 29 ], elevated startle response [ 30 ], increased tendency to catastrophize [ 31 ], high hostility and low self-efficacy [ 3 ], negative self-appraisals [ 14 , 32 ], occupational stress, lack of social support and shift work [ 10 , 33 35 ], external locus of control in the workplace, low education and low resilience [ 24 , 36 ], and high social introversion and masculinity [ 37 ]. These risk factors seem to fall into three broad categories—intrapersonal [ 11 22 , 27 31 , 36 ], workplace-related [ 10 , 11 , 14 , 23 – 26 ] and social [ 10 , 16 , 33 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%