Youth Cultures under Authoritarian Regimes

Abstract

This article looks at the role of a popular youth subculture as a form of resistance to dominant constructions of youth under National Socialism in Germany. At the time when youth were strongly pressured to participate in the dominant youth organization and to conform to a particular model of “youthfulness” associated with fascist modernity, there were few opportunities to construct alternative ideas of youth. However, participation in the “Hamburg Swings” subculture through going to dances, listening to music, and using certain styles of speech, walking, and dressing offered an opportunity to construct alternative ideas of youth, ones heralding a more postmodern orientation. Swing came from America and emphasized a sensuous, fun-loving, hedonistic style. It was condemned as “degenerate music.” Many members of this subculture were punished; some were even sent to concentration camps. This article draws parallels between this role of youth subcultures as a form of latent opposition to authoritarian regimes and dominant official constructions of youth under both National Socialism and the former Soviet Communist regimes of Eastern Europe.

Bulgarian Sport Policy 1945–1989: A Strategic Relations Approach

“…[14] Previously secret documents revealed, as demonstrated by Claire Wallace and Raimund Alt, that cultural opposition to dogmatic totalitarian visions emerged in Nazi Germany, as well as in Soviet Russia and other East European countries. [15] This challenges the widely accepted notion that the communist states were identical with civil society. Most western commentators tend to view civil society as playing a mediating role between the citizens of the state and the power of state apparatus.…”

The Influence of Power on Leisure: Implications for Inclusive Leisure Services

“…To increase understanding of power's influence, Foucault commented: "When we examine how, in the late eighteenth century, it was decided to choose imprisonment as the essential mode of punishment, one sees that it was after a long elaboration of various techniques that made it possible to locate people, to fix them in precise places, to constrict them to a certain number of gestures and habits-in short, it was a form of 'dressage'" [39] (pp. [104][105]. Building on Foucault's insights on power, scholars have proposed various strategies to reduce exclusion and achieve inclusion of all people into leisure experiences that cluster into three approaches.…”

“…In particular, youth may use art to express defiance of the dominant narrative organized by adults who enjoy higher opportunities to shape leisure discourse, thus creating counternarratives. As an example, in the 1930s, German youth used swing dancing to act against restrictions imposed by Nazis [104].…”