Youth motor competence across stages of maturity: Perceptions of physical education teachers and strength and conditioning coaches

Abstract

Physical education (PE) teachers and strength and conditioning (S&C) coaches are well placed to develop motor competence within youth populations. However, both groups’ perceptions of important motor competencies are relatively unknown, especially when considering stage of maturity. Therefore, this study aimed to 1) present PE teachers and S&C coaches’ perceptions of motor competence importance according to stage of maturity; 2) compare perceptions of motor competence between stages of maturity, and between PE teachers and S&C coaches; and 3) explore factors that influence PE teachers and S&C coaches’ perceptions of motor competence importance. Via a mixed-method questionnaire, 47 PE teachers (professional experience = 10.3±6.6 years) and 48 S&C coaches (professional experience = 8.6±4.8 years) rated the importance of developing 21 motor competencies across four stages of maturity (childhood, pre-peak height velocity [PHV], circa-PHV, and post-PHV) using a Likert-scale (1 = not important, 5 = very important). Participants also provided open-ended explanations for their perceptions. Frequency analysis indicated that participants rated a broad range of competencies important, with S&C coaches rating more competencies important than PE teachers across all stages of maturity. Mixed-model analysis highlighted several differences in motor competence importance when comparing perceptions between participant groups, and between stages of maturity for PE teachers and S&C coaches. For example, S&C coaches rated strength-based motor competencies less important during childhood (d = -1.83 to -0.43), while PE teachers rated them less important during childhood (d = -2.22 to -0.42) and pre-PHV (d = -1.70 to -0.51) compared to other stages of maturity. Codebook thematic analysis showed several factors that influenced participant’s perceptions of motor competence importance (e.g., participants understanding of themselves). The findings suggest that multiple environments may be required to adequately facilitate motor competence development amongst youth. Coach education should target misunderstandings around the risks of strength-based activity during early stages of maturity and the benefits of developing strength-based motor competencies across youth populations.

The Effect of an Early Life Motor Skill Intervention on Physical Activity in Growth-Restricted Mice

“…Greater motor skill attainment and motor development in healthy children are associated with greater physical activity engagement in adulthood (39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46). An intervention designed to improve motor skill attainment could therefore lead to improvements in skeletal muscle growth/development and subsequently adulthood physical activity engagement in the growth-restricted population.…”

How Can Games Be Functional in the Implementation of Long-Term Athletic Development (LTAD) in Youth Sports?<br>—Exploratory Learning Experiences and Opportunities to Increase Physical Efficiency

“…As an integral component of athleticism, motor competence refers to an individual's ability to perform a wide range of motor tasks, where outcomes are un- derpinned by movement quality, control, and coordination (Burton et al, 2022;Hulteen et al, 2018). Motor competence consists of multi-dimensional movement capacities (simple, combined, and complex) that are all inter-related and are subdivided into locomotor (walking, sprinting), object control (throw, catching), and stability (hold, balance) skills (Hulteen et al, 2018).…”