2017
DOI: 10.1123/iscj.2016-0092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youth Sport Coaches’ Perspective on Positive Youth Development and its Worth in Mainstream Coach Education Courses

Abstract: Positive youth development (PYD) is a framework that has been widely used within sport research to outline sport’s potential as a developmental context. Past research has indicated how coaches play important roles in facilitating PYD through sport and yet, PYD-related material remains largely absent from mainstream coach education courses (CEC). The purpose of the current study was to examine youth sport coaches’ perspective on PYD and its worth in mainstream coach education courses. The participants were twel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A lack of education on positive youth development in sport (Erickson et al, 2008;Harwood, 2008;Santos et al, 2017) may attribute to coaching mistakes and limitations (Lerner et al, 2005;Strachan et al, 2016) that negatively influence athletes (Petitpas et al, 2005;Cote et al, 2010;Vella et al, 2013). Positive youth development coach education programs help coaches develop confidence (Falcao et al, 2012;Santos et al, 2017), self-awareness (Smith and Smoll, 1997) and knowledge (Vella et al, 2013) in fostering positive development in athletes. Despite the advantages of educating coaches on positive youth development, most compulsory coach education courses focus primarily on sporting skills and tactics (Santos et al, 2017).…”
Section: Problems With Positive Youth Development Through Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lack of education on positive youth development in sport (Erickson et al, 2008;Harwood, 2008;Santos et al, 2017) may attribute to coaching mistakes and limitations (Lerner et al, 2005;Strachan et al, 2016) that negatively influence athletes (Petitpas et al, 2005;Cote et al, 2010;Vella et al, 2013). Positive youth development coach education programs help coaches develop confidence (Falcao et al, 2012;Santos et al, 2017), self-awareness (Smith and Smoll, 1997) and knowledge (Vella et al, 2013) in fostering positive development in athletes. Despite the advantages of educating coaches on positive youth development, most compulsory coach education courses focus primarily on sporting skills and tactics (Santos et al, 2017).…”
Section: Problems With Positive Youth Development Through Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), responsibilities at home, lack of competent and highly trained coaches, and low parental support (Whitley et al, 2013). Some of these barriers are consistent with those identified in Western contexts (Bean & Forneris, 2017;Santos et al, 2017). That is, research indicates that even when coaches have been fortunate enough to participate in coaching education curriculum, there is limited focus in these courses on how to facilitate life skills development (Santos et al, 2017).…”
Section: Youth Coaching In Southern Africa and Eswatinisupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Some of these barriers are consistent with those identified in Western contexts (Bean & Forneris, 2017;Santos et al, 2017). That is, research indicates that even when coaches have been fortunate enough to participate in coaching education curriculum, there is limited focus in these courses on how to facilitate life skills development (Santos et al, 2017). Whitley, Gould, Wright, and Hayden (2017) outlined several additional barriers to emphasizing life skills development in underserved communities in South Africa.…”
Section: Youth Coaching In Southern Africa and Eswatinimentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Sin embargo, en algunos estudios e intervenciones tradicionales realizadas con entrenadores, no tenían en cuenta los diferentes escenarios del contexto de entrenamiento (i.e., pre-competición, entrenamiento, post-competición, competición), ni hacían referencia a situaciones específicas de cada deporte y, además, creían que no tenían recursos suficientes para incorporar el trabajo de habilidades psicosociales en sus sesiones (Harwood, 2016;Santos et al, 2019). Esta afirmación va en línea con la concepción de que para poder influir positivamente en sus deportistas es importante considerar la medida en que se ven capaces de influir en el aprendizaje y el rendimiento de sus deportistas (i.e., Coaching efficacy; Feltz et al,1999), además de promover reflexiones sobre su filosofía y trabajar las habilidades necesarias para que puedan desarrollar estas estrategias (Santos et al, 2017).…”
Section: Actualización Documentalunclassified