YouTube – An unreliable source of information for Total hip replacement

Yadav, Amit Kumar; Kumar, G S Prasanna; Khanna, Vikram

doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2020.08.010

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous research suggests that low-quality medical information obtained on YouTube harms the relationship between a doctor and his/her patients 20 . Based on many publications evaluating the quality of videos on various orthopaedic diseases, we concluded that the videos' accuracy and quality were low [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Youtube Contents Provides Inadequate Information About The Diagnosis And Treatment Of Hallux Valgus

Sahin¹

2021

Dicle Tıp Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

According to the data in September 2020, 63.2% of the world population uses the internet. Internet is one of the most important sources for fast and easy access to information. Youtube is the second most popular social media network platform. Our aim in this descriptive study was to evaluate the accuracy and quality of the information in hallux valgus videos shared on YouTube. Methods:The keywords "hallux valgus" and "bunyon" were searched on Youtube respectively. The videos were evaluated by two independent reviewers according to VPI, Discern, GQS, JAMA and HVS scoring systems.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Youtube Contents Provides Inadequate Information About The Diagnosis And Treatment Of Hallux Valgus

Sahin¹

2021

Dicle Tıp Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since YouTube has shown to be a poor source for general meniscal information, and our study showcases it as a poor source for meniscus tear rehabilitation, it is an unreliable source for medical information on meniscus injuries and management [ 22 ]. Not only is YouTube a poor source for meniscal information, but it has also been shown to be a poor source for hip arthroscopy, ACLR, or total hip replacement information [ 6 , 16 , 23 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Regarding Meniscus Tear Rehabilitation

Abed¹,

Ray²,

Smathers³

et al. 2023

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:YouTube is an open-source platform where creators can record and upload videos for others to see. As the popularity of YouTube increases, it is being increasingly used for healthcare-related information. However, with the relative ease of uploading videos, the content quality of individual videos is not regulated. This study aimed to assess and analyze the content quality of YouTube videos concerning meniscus tear rehabilitation. We hypothesized that most videos would be of low quality.Methods: The keywords "meniscus tear treatment," "meniscus tear recovery," "meniscus tear physical therapy," and "meniscus tear rehabilitation" were used for searching videos on YouTube. A total of 50 videos was analyzed in this study that related to meniscal rehabilitation, grouped into one of four categories: nonphysician professionals (physical therapists and chiropractors) (n=28), physicians (with or without academic affiliation) (n=5), non-academic healthcare-related websites (n=10), and non-professional individuals (n=7). Videos were then assessed by two independent authors using three scoring systems, which included the Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN, and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) scores. The number of likes, comments, video length, and views were collected for each video. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare quality scores and video analytics.Results: The overall median GQS, modified DISCERN, and JAMA scores were 3 (interquartile range (IQR): 2-3), 2 (IQR: 2-2), and 2 (IQR: 2-2), respectively. Sorted by GQS scores, 20 videos were of low quality (40%), 21 were intermediate (42%), and nine were of high quality (18%). Non-physician professionals produced 56% (28 of 50) of the videos assessed, with physical therapists constituting 86% (24 of 28) of this category. The median duration of each video was 6:54 (IQR: 3:59-10:50) minutes, views was 42,262 (IQR: 12,491), and likes was 877 (IQR: 239-4,850). Kruskal-Wallis testing showed a significant difference between JAMA scores, likes, and video length duration between video categories (p<0.028). Conclusion:The overall median reliability of YouTube videos on meniscus tear rehabilitation measured by JAMA and modified DISCERN scores was low. The overall median video quality, as assessed by GQS scores, was intermediate. Video quality was highly variable, with fewer than 20% meeting high-quality standards. As a result, patients are often viewing lower quality videos when researching their condition online.

show abstract

“…The AFCS is built upon a foundation of patient-oriented information from reputable sources such as the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), and the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS). The comprehensive nature of this source material ensures the scoring system is both comprehensive and reflective of current standards in patient education regarding ankle fractures [ 9 , 14 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Quality and Clarity of YouTube Videos as an Informational Source for Ankle Fractures: A Study of the Turkish Population

Gökçeoğlu,

İncesu,

Dağ

et al. 2024

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objective The significance of YouTube as a prominent source of healthcare-related information cannot be overstated. Its influence on patient education is substantial. However, despite its popularity, there has been little research into the quality and comprehensibility of videos related to ankle fractures, a condition with increasing incidence rates, particularly in the context of Turkey. To address this gap in the literature and the growing reliance on digital platforms for health information during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this study aims to assess the quality, clarity, and pedagogical value of YouTube videos on ankle fractures for the Turkish population. Methodology A comprehensive examination of 150 YouTube videos concerning ankle fractures, employing exacting inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify 52 videos for in-depth analysis was undertaken. The investigation entailed an assessment of content quality, presentation style, and user interaction, utilizing the criteria established by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), as well as a novel measurement known as the Ankle Fracture Content Score (AFCS). A statistical analysis was executed to gauge the educational value and dependability of the information presented. Results The majority of ankle fracture management videos were found to be uploaded by medical professionals, covering various aspects such as rehabilitation and patient testimonials. However, the overall educational quality was suboptimal, with patient-shared videos lacking in depth and accuracy. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in content quality across different uploader categories, except for notably lower educational quality in videos shared by patients. Conclusions The findings underscore a significant need for healthcare professionals and academic institutions in Turkey to produce and share high-quality, reliable, and comprehensible videos on ankle fractures. Leveraging YouTube's extensive reach can significantly improve health literacy among the Turkish public, ensuring access to accurate and trustworthy health information.

show abstract

YouTube – An unreliable source of information for Total hip replacement

Cited by 10 publications

References 8 publications

Youtube Contents Provides Inadequate Information About The Diagnosis And Treatment Of Hallux Valgus

Youtube Contents Provides Inadequate Information About The Diagnosis And Treatment Of Hallux Valgus

Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Regarding Meniscus Tear Rehabilitation

Assessing the Quality and Clarity of YouTube Videos as an Informational Source for Ankle Fractures: A Study of the Turkish Population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About