2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

YouTube as a crowd-generated water level archive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other cases, mostly during flooding situations, citizens provide pictures (Fohringer et al, 2015;Kutija et al, 2014;Li et al, 2017;McDougall, 2011;McDougall and Temple-Watts, 2012;Smith et al, 2015;Starkey et al, 2017) or videos (Le 15 Boursicaud et al, 2016;Le Coz et al, 2016;Michelsen et al, 2016). In the case of pictures/images, the water level is compared with objects in the images that have known or approximately known dimensions.…”
Section: Water Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other cases, mostly during flooding situations, citizens provide pictures (Fohringer et al, 2015;Kutija et al, 2014;Li et al, 2017;McDougall, 2011;McDougall and Temple-Watts, 2012;Smith et al, 2015;Starkey et al, 2017) or videos (Le 15 Boursicaud et al, 2016;Le Coz et al, 2016;Michelsen et al, 2016). In the case of pictures/images, the water level is compared with objects in the images that have known or approximately known dimensions.…”
Section: Water Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…non-scientists) in the generation of new knowledge". In the same manner that the involvement of citizens can be diverse, such is the way their participation is found in the scientific literature: 5  Citizen Science (Buytaert et al, 2014)  Citizen Observatory (Degrossi et al, 2014)  Citizen Sensing (Foody et al, 2013)  Trained volunteers (Gallart et al, 2016)  Participatory data collection methods (Michelsen et al, 2016) 10  Crowdsourcing (Leibovici et al, 2015)  Participatory sensing (Kotovirta et al, 2014)  Community-based monitoring (Conrad and Hilchey, 2011)  Volunteer Geographic Information (Klonner et al, 2016)  Eye witnesses (Poser and Dransch, 2010) 15  Non-authoritative sources  Human Sensor Network (Aulov et al, 2014)  Crowdsourced Geographic Information Some of the terms used by the above-mentioned articles have specific definitions that are used to delineate debates on the 20 social mechanisms of citizen participation. Others are just the best form the researcher found to characterise the contribution or the citizen (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent use of active transmitters (Ravazzolo et al, 2015) or ground cameras (Benacchio et al, 2017) provided useful insights into the dynamics of logs during floods, but are still experimental. The present paper shows that conventional methods may be successfully complemented by participatory sensing (Michelsen et al, 2016) and that despite some relatively minor issues (i.e. access to internet technology, geographic and demographic biases) it offers an interesting alternative for collecting relevant information of infrequent events in remote areas.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is part of a growing application of so-called "citizen science" approaches to water resources systems operation (Buytaert et al, 2014) and, more generally, to diverse environmental problems (Fraternali et al, 2012). Crowdsourced observations may act as low-cost virtual sensors in a variety of environmental contexts (Lowry and Fienen, 2013), for example, contributing to monitoring the dynamics of forests (e.g., Daume et al, 2014), storms (e.g., Good et al, 2014), or streamflow (e.g., Michelsen et al, 2016), with potential benefit in terms of the prediction of flood events and of the timely delivery of alarms (e.g., Smith et al, 2015;Mazzoleni et al, 2015a, b;Fohringer et al, 2015;Le Boursicaud et al, 2016). However, despite this interest in environmental public weband user-generated data (Vitolo et al, 2015), most works focus on data collection and analysis, with limited assessment of the practical value of such crowdsourced information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%