2014 IEEE 15th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/spawc.2014.6941327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zadoff-Chu sequence based time-domain SNR estimation for OFDM systems

Abstract: The optimization of wireless orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems is based on the knowledge of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Most of the existing methods for the SNR estimation operates in the frequency-domain and assumes perfect carrier frequency offset (CFO) synchronization. However, it has been shown that in real systems in the presence of the residual CFO this estimators are prone to performance degradation. This problem can be avoided by estimating the SNR in the time-domain. In th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the computational complexity of the PTD scheme is evaluated and compared with the conventional Zadoff-Chu preamble-based time domain method [25], considering the floating point operations per second (FLOPs) as a complexity metric. In general, FLOPs means the number of complex additions and multiplications required to perform one SNR estimate.…”
Section: Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, the computational complexity of the PTD scheme is evaluated and compared with the conventional Zadoff-Chu preamble-based time domain method [25], considering the floating point operations per second (FLOPs) as a complexity metric. In general, FLOPs means the number of complex additions and multiplications required to perform one SNR estimate.…”
Section: Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the Zadoff-Chu sequence SNR estimator involves 4N FFT + 2 number of FLOPs, as given in Table 1 of [25]. Hence, the PTD SNR estimator provides the computational saving of approximately 45% (for Q � 16) compared to the conventional Zadoff-Chu sequence estimator.…”
Section: Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations