2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2005.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zariski's multiplicity question and aligned singularities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(For an updated survey paper, see for instance [5].) Given a hypersurface singularity (V, 0) germ, we denote by C V its projectivized tangent cone and by BV be the blowup of V at p. The second problem by Zariski is to find out if the following assertion is true: B-problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For an updated survey paper, see for instance [5].) Given a hypersurface singularity (V, 0) germ, we denote by C V its projectivized tangent cone and by BV be the blowup of V at p. The second problem by Zariski is to find out if the following assertion is true: B-problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) T w (ln r2 r1 + α 2 i) = τ 2 + ϑ 1 (0)i, where τ 2 is minimal with ln r 2 r 1 − 2 ln L ≤ τ 2 ≤ ln r 2 r 1 + 2 ln L. 6 Here ϑ 1 is the function given by Proposition 11…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 22 and Lema 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ξ and are holomorphic functions with ξ(0) = 0; (C3) h 0 is a semiquasihomogeneous polynomial with respect to z ; (C4) n = 3 (i.e., {h t } is a family of plane curve singularities). In [3], the first author proved the following equimultiplicity result for nonisolated singularities. n k t (z).…”
Section: Deformations Of the Form F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%