Zeitenwende for the G7: Insights From the Munich Security Index Special G7 Edition

Bunde, Tobias; Eisentraut, Sophie

doi:10.47342/jdie4364

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among the allies on NATO's eastern flank—Poland, Romania and the Baltic states—the citizens have been showing grave concerns about the Russian nuclear sabre‐rattling and even expressed relatively high support for nuclear weapons acquisition (Sukin & Lanoszka, 2022). In Germany, the poll commissioned by the Münich Security Conference showed that Russia is now seen as the most serious risk for the country's security, in a dramatic increase since the 2021 survey (Bunde & Eisentraut, 2022, pp. 8–10).…”

Section: Major Events Wars and Attitude Changementioning

confidence: 99%

Hawks in the making? European public views on nuclear weaponspost‐Ukraine

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the past, the European public has not been enthusiastic about nuclear deterrence and the stationing of US American nuclear weapons in Europe. Has the Russian invasion of Ukraine changed that aversion? We conducted a unique study, surveying the same population of respondents at two points in time-in September 2020 and in June 2022. We find that European respondents became much more hawkish after the invasion: nuclear deterrence was viewed more favourably, the willingness to use nuclear weapons increased, and support for the withdrawal of nuclear weapons dropped significantly. The paper draws a number of policy implications from these results.

show abstract

Section: Major Events Wars and Attitude Changementioning

confidence: 99%

Hawks in the making? European public views on nuclear weaponspost‐Ukraine

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Politicians and security experts around the world referred to the outbreak of open warfare on 24/02/2022 as historical turning point (Bunde and Eisentraut, 2022). This suggests that interactions between (some) G20 members may have fundamentally changed in the months after the start of the conflict.…”

Section: Modelling Fundamental Responsiveness Shiftsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Politico-Economic Dynamics during a Local Conflict: Reciprocal Patterns of Cooperation and Sanctions

Weisser

2022

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis &Amp; Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Employing global daily news coverage on interactions between stakeholders in G20 countries, this research offers a near-real-time analysis of changing interaction patterns between Russia and other G20 economies after the onset of open military conflict. Building on an event study over eight months, further analyses of reciprocal response dynamics point to potentially costly short-term consequences of sanctions, such as the breakdown and diversion of international cooperation amongst major economies in a broader sense. Once such a reciprocal cooperation decay has set in, re-establishing international cooperation between major societal actors may take considerable time.

show abstract

Lessons (to be) learned? Germany’s Zeitenwende and European security after the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Bunde

2022

Contemporary Security Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zeitenwende for the G7: Insights From the Munich Security Index Special G7 Edition

Cited by 4 publications

References 5 publications

Hawks in the making? European public views on nuclear weaponspost‐Ukraine

Hawks in the making? European public views on nuclear weaponspost‐Ukraine

Global Politico-Economic Dynamics during a Local Conflict: Reciprocal Patterns of Cooperation and Sanctions

Lessons (to be) learned? Germany’s Zeitenwende and European security after the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About