2013
DOI: 10.1364/oe.21.018899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero-frequency refractivity of water vapor, comparison of Debye and van-Vleck Weisskopf theory

Abstract: We show that the zero-frequency, refractivity of water vapor calculated by the van-Vleck Weisskopf theory via a summation over all the water lines from 22.2 GHz to 30 THz can explain all of the previous measurements from 0.5 MHz to microwave, mm-waves and THz frequencies. This result removes a long standing discrepancy in comparisons of measurements and theory, and is in excellent agreement with experiments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the excellent agreement between ϕ(ν) and ϕ mod (ν), the frequency dependence of L eff (ν) highlights the smaller contributions that we have neglected thus far, i.e., the effective frequency dependence of L THz . We identify three main contributions: (a) Standing waves within the Si lenses give rise to a modulation of L eff with a period of about 4.1 GHz, see inset of [23,24]. The absorption lines are very well resolved even for this comparably short path in air.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Due to the excellent agreement between ϕ(ν) and ϕ mod (ν), the frequency dependence of L eff (ν) highlights the smaller contributions that we have neglected thus far, i.e., the effective frequency dependence of L THz . We identify three main contributions: (a) Standing waves within the Si lenses give rise to a modulation of L eff with a period of about 4.1 GHz, see inset of [23,24]. The absorption lines are very well resolved even for this comparably short path in air.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The remainder comes from the 557-GHz line. Grischkowsky et al (2013) show that the full theoretical calculation behind Eq. (13.70), based on Van Vleck-Weisskopf line shapes and incorporating all water lines from 22.2 GHz through 30 THz, gives agreement with the empirical expression for refractivity without any ad hoc corrections.…”
Section: Origin Of Refractionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Figure 3 compares the IFFT compensated pulse with the (A 2 and A 3 ), dispersion compensated pulse, which shows excellent compensation. Figure 4a shows the complete phase calculation of β(ω)z without the constant (zero frequency) refractivity term [3][4][5][6], compared to the 3-A parameter fit of Φ A , with (ω o /2π) = 852 GHz, marked by the vertical line. The difference between the two plots (residuals) is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Mahboubeh Mandehgar and D Grischkowskymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our case, we remove the strong linear phase ramp as follows: Φ(ω,z) = (ω/c) (n(ω) -n(0) -2)z = β(ω)z, for which (n(0) -1) = (61.06 x 10 -6 ) [6]. Figure 1 shows the recently studied input THz bit sequence (011010) for the 852 GHz channel and the measured and calculated output THz bit sequence [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%