2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.88.025036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero mode effect generalization for the electromagnetic current in the light front

Abstract: We consider in this work the electromagnetic current for a system composed by two charged bosons and show that it has a structure of many bodies even in the impulse approximation, when described in the light front time x + . In terms of the two-body component for the bound state, the current contains two-body operators. We discuss the process of pair creation from the interacting photon and interpret it as a zero mode contribution to the current and its consequences for the components of currents in the light-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, results from different current components may be different due to violations of Lorentz symmetry introduced by the Fock sector truncation as well as by the modeling of systems. These approximations have led to extensive discussions in the literature [11][12][13][14][15]. The "+" component, known as the "good current", is typically used, together with the Drell-Yan frame (q + = 0), to avoid contributions from pair production/annihilation in vacuum.…”
Section: B Light-front Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, results from different current components may be different due to violations of Lorentz symmetry introduced by the Fock sector truncation as well as by the modeling of systems. These approximations have led to extensive discussions in the literature [11][12][13][14][15]. The "+" component, known as the "good current", is typically used, together with the Drell-Yan frame (q + = 0), to avoid contributions from pair production/annihilation in vacuum.…”
Section: B Light-front Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, withV m j =1 (Q 2 ), simply taking the nonrelativistic wavefunction would always lead to zero since the expression in Eq. (14) involves the vanishing subdominant terms. To be specific, we examine the transition form factors at Q 2 = 0, where they can be interpreted as the overlaps of wavefunctions in coordinate space [ψ (m j ) ss ( r ⊥ , x)], shown in Eqs.…”
Section: Impulse Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our work we show that these arc contributions are absent for we deal with "ladder" type diagrams and evaluating all the relevant ranges of integration for k + variables we get the correct terms equivalent to the results of computations obtained via covariant Minkowski calculations. This being our present case, it is well worth noting that no "treacherous" points have to be dealt with in our "ladder" diagram type calculations and also that our methodology does not involve any subtle or difficult points like in the case of those treacherous arc contributions, recognized as not only very difficult to handle but requiring careful consideration of the limiting procedure and thus of end-point singularities [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, this procedure of "pole dislocation" has no physical grounds and the arrival at the correct result is just fortuitous. We demonstrate that the light front Fock space of positive quanta solutions is incomplete and that as a consequence the non triviality of the light front vacuum is a mandatory feature in the new scenario [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%