2018
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.13704.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zika virus infection as a cause of congenital brain abnormalities and Guillain-Barré syndrome: From systematic review to living systematic review

Abstract: The Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak in the Americas has caused Background. international concern due to neurological sequelae linked to the infection, such as microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). The World Health Organization stated that there is "sufficient evidence to conclude that Zika virus is a cause of congenital abnormalities and is a trigger of GBS". This conclusion was based on a systematic review of the evidence published until 30.05.2016. Since then, the body of evidence has grown substantiall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(185 reference statements)
0
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ZIKV in an endemic setting, such as in Africa and Asia, could prove a suitable setting as well. However, ZIKV circulation in endemic setting is not well described and the occurrence of adverse outcomes in this context is less documented [9]. Further research in understanding the transmission of the virus in an endemic context is therefore needed.…”
Section: Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ZIKV in an endemic setting, such as in Africa and Asia, could prove a suitable setting as well. However, ZIKV circulation in endemic setting is not well described and the occurrence of adverse outcomes in this context is less documented [9]. Further research in understanding the transmission of the virus in an endemic context is therefore needed.…”
Section: Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, doctors in Brazil started reporting clusters of infants born with microcephaly, a severe congenital abnormality, and of adults with Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing neurological condition, resulting in the declaration by the World Health Organization (WHO) of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) [7]. WHO stated, in September 2016, that ZIKV in pregnancy was the most likely cause of the clusters of microcephaly, and other adverse congenital outcomes [8,9]. The risk of an affected pregnancy appears highest during the first trimester, with estimates between 1.0 and 4.5% [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the period of the first review [10] and subsequent update [13], we screened 2,847 publications. During the remaining period, between January 7, 2017 and January 1, 2019, we screened an additional 2,594 publications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZIKV in an endemic setting, such as in Africa and Asia, could prove a suitable setting as well. However, ZIKV circulation in endemic setting is not well described and the occurrence of adverse outcomes in this context is less documented Counotte et al (2018). Further research in understanding the transmission of the virus in an endemic context is therefore needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, doctors in Brazil started reporting clusters of infants born with microcephaly, a severe congenital abnormality, and of adults with Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing neurological condition, resulting in the declaration by the World Health Organization (WHO) of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) (World Health Organization, 2016). WHO stated, in September 2016, that ZIKV in pregnancy was the most likely cause of the clusters of microcephaly, and other adverse congenital outcomes (Krauer et al, 2017; Counotte et al, 2018). The risk of an affected pregnancy appears highest during the first trimester, with estimates between 1.0 and 4.5% (Cauchemez et al, 2016; Johansson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%