1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00009940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zinc-phosphorus-iron interaction studies in maize

Abstract: The effect of Z n -P -F e interaction in the nutrition of the maize plant was first examined by a well-controlled pot culture experiment and the results subsequently evaluated by a field trial.Dry matter production by root and shoot was affected significantly by the nutrient interaction. Enhanced P application reduced Zn concentration in shoot by more than half as compared to root. While Zr~ concentration per se in the plant increased, its relative mobility from root to shoot was vastly impeded, implying a phy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatments receiving no P application had the highest Zn concentration in both genotypes, whilst single P application tended to reduce the Zn concentration. These results corroborate earlier findings of Farah and Solimon (1986), Olsen (1972), and Nair and Babu (1975). The decrease in Zn concentration due to P application at 60 kg ha −1 may result from the formation of soluble Zn‐P compounds in the soil as reported by Krishnasamy (1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The treatments receiving no P application had the highest Zn concentration in both genotypes, whilst single P application tended to reduce the Zn concentration. These results corroborate earlier findings of Farah and Solimon (1986), Olsen (1972), and Nair and Babu (1975). The decrease in Zn concentration due to P application at 60 kg ha −1 may result from the formation of soluble Zn‐P compounds in the soil as reported by Krishnasamy (1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…By contrast, roots of P-starved A. thaliana plants had significantly larger Fe concentrations than did roots of P-replete plants in two different studies (Misson et al, 2005;Baxter et al, 2008;Raghothama et al, 2008), as did roots of bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.; Wallace et al, 1974) and rice seedlings (Zheng et al, 2009). No effect of P supply was observed on Fe concentrations in roots of maize (Prabhakaran Nair and Rabu, 1975) or poplar (Kavka and Polle, 2017). These contradicting observations preclude consensus on the interactions between P deficiency and Fe nutrition, but they do indicate crosstalk between Fe and P nutrition which merits further investigation Figure 5A for schematic representation of comparisons.…”
Section: Growth and Ionome Responses Of B Oleracea Accession Receivimentioning
confidence: 96%